I came to different conclusions about redpill

[Sustacel250]

I noticed redpillers started by observing woman behavior. And then they created a false personality to match what they perceived to be woman choice.

Redpill itself is older, it comes from feminism of the 90s where it was told to men to "pick signals" and taught about woman secret code of gestures and body language. Redpillers being mainly a right wing group follow pattern of the right wing meaning they approach an idea 20 or 30 years later when is exhausted. Basically right wing is leftism slowed down. So the idea of the redpill was given to these people as "absolute novelty" when it was just hookup culture repackaged for lower class basically.

In any case these people were doing observations about women. Lets observe a fact: women like jerks.

Well, a redpiller would conclude "therefore I have to be a jerk".
I concluded different. I concluded "therefore women are trash, I dont want to be a jerk".

In the redpill community, people like myself are seen as "immature" and they tell me I dont undertand woman behavior. Perhaps they mix the word "understand" with "approve" and "accept". I do understand, its just I dont approve, disagree and dont accept it.

In the perspective of a redpiller, after they run their observations, they conclude "therefore I have to behave the way women want me to behave". Instead, in the perspective of the incel I conclude "Therefore I will do what I want, conscious of the fact women discard me, I will hate women, I will not do evil, not do what they want".

This is more or less what separates an incel from a redpiller. We know the same thing. We just conclude a different thing. I didnt conclude I have to bend down to women and feminism.