Sustacel250 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 04:32
You twisted it and worded it different and summarized it as "you like bravery".
You said they have guts, which literally means "they are brave". No word twisting on my side.
I don't understand what makes you think like that, and what makes you respect them. It doesn't become clear from your post. Either way I can't fathom how any man of honor could have any kind of respect for feminists. That in itself is deserving of disrespect towards the person who feels respect for feminists.
Can you give an example of a feminist woman who you think "has guts" and deserves your respect?
Darth_aurelius wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 19:14
When are you going to accept the invitation that the Politburo of the movement has graciously extended you to become a fully inducted member of the IPF?
I've had some issues with my computer. As you saw I've not been on element for a while. I'll try to get there as soon as possible.
Vincent wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 07:47
Can you give an example of a feminist woman who you think "has guts" and deserves your respect?
For example author of scum manifesto valerie solanas. Or even dworkins, I liked her too.
I dont answer to the rest of the message because you keep doing the "so youre saying" meme. I learned from my interactions with reddit its pointless to tell them to read it again.
Darth_aurelius wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 19:14
When are you going to accept the invitation that the Politburo of the movement has graciously extended you to become a fully inducted member of the IPF?
I've had some issues with my computer. As you saw I've not been on element for a while. I'll try to get there as soon as possible.
Please do so as we need more diligent and honorable men who possess the courage of their convictions to help expand our reach and enhance the power of this movement.
Captain, Commanding Officer and Founding Father of the Incel Movement
Vincent wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 07:47
Can you give an example of a feminist woman who you think "has guts" and deserves your respect?
For example author of scum manifesto valerie solanas. Or even dworkins, I liked her too.
I dont answer to the rest of the message because you keep doing the "so youre saying" meme. I learned from my interactions with reddit its pointless to tell them to read it again.
VH911 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 11:15
So you're saying that he won the arguments?
He obviously lost and he had no "argument". When you rephrase someone opinion that is not an "argument". If you want to start arguing with me, go ahead.
My opinion is that simps are lowly scum. I dont say it for internet purpose I really mean it. I dont respect them. If they walk with their wife I abruptly talk to the wife and ignore the simp. I have something more than distaste I would say I really hate them. So I try to keep it civil but I dont owe them any respect. They often try (and fail) to bully me.
Sustacel250 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 12:05
My opinion is that simps are lowly scum. I dont say it for internet purpose I really mean it. I dont respect them. If they walk with their wife I abruptly talk to the wife and ignore the simp. I have something more than distaste I would say I really hate them. So I try to keep it civil but I dont owe them any respect. They often try (and fail) to bully me.
I can instead respect an enemy. In many ways.
ok, i understand.
but does that mean that Vincent won the 'arguments'?
VH911 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:03
ok, i understand.
but does that mean that Vincent won the 'arguments'?
No idea buddy. I dont feel like conforming. Im done with incel scene and their performative identity. I dont get pussy. Even if I pretend to agree with incel talking points I will not get pussy. Online conformity will never give me pussy. So I may as well speak my mind. I dont agree with redpill and incel identity. I will not get pussy if I agree or disagree.
This conformity is doing nothing. It does not gives me pussy so I have no incentive to be an incel online. I can do what I want basically, even replying to a rhetorical reddit-tier questions with an essay.
Plus I dont owe anything rational to someone who rephrases my ideas and calls it "an argument". I can go on indefinitely. I like to shitpost.
VH911 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:03
ok, i understand.
but does that mean that Vincent won the 'arguments'?
No idea buddy. I dont feel like conforming. Im done with incel scene and their performative identity. I dont get pussy. Even if I pretend to agree with incel talking points I will not get pussy. Online conformity will never give me pussy. So I may as well speak my mind. I dont agree with redpill and incel identity. I will not get pussy if I agree or disagree.
This conformity is doing nothing. It does not gives me pussy so I have no incentive to be an incel online. I can do what I want basically, even replying to a rhetorical reddit-tier questions with an essay.
Plus I dont owe anything rational to someone who rephrases my ideas and calls it "an argument". I can go on indefinitely. I like to shitpost.
VH911 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:10
so does that mean ..?
You see, I wanted to go back to incels.is and ask them what is "ascending". I am tired and I want them to tell me about it. What does it means? They see women as a goal to attain in life? What are they, pajeets?
I dont know. What sort of perspective is that? I also dont understand this idea of having the state giving us women. The structure to achieve it has never been done in history. It would be ruinous for anyone wanting to be a patriarch so you would have to remove all current religions first because all patriarchs will never agree to allow the state to take their daughters and have them raped by a horde of pajeets from incels.is.
