Nick Fuentes on Tolerance

[VH911]

[Orzmund]

Ironically, the tolerance-touting liberals, left-winged political activists, and other sentimentalists belonging to the deluge of feminism, decadence, civil disobedience, and every other ideologically-driven perversion wreaking peril unto our civilisations, are supremely intolerant of adverse beliefs and motives. The party of the aforementioned are incapable of addressing its opposition as morally or intellectually valid, contention is their sole motivation.

Off topic, but here. Temperance acts as the foundation for fortitude, fortitude for sophistication, and sophistication for justice; therefore, within the society ridden with injustice, philistine-thinking, cowardice and decadence has reduced itself to the preliminary condition for social life to emerge--that being dissimulation. Essentially, society in this primordial state is merely disguised as a necessary mechanism toward its perpetuation. It contains no values, no customs, no people: all it consists of is its pretentious constitution.

[VH911]

Ironically, the tolerance-touting liberals, left-winged political activists, and other sentimentalists belonging to the deluge of feminism, decadence, civil disobedience, and every other ideologically-driven perversion wreaking peril unto our civilisations, are supremely intolerant of adverse beliefs and motives. The party of the aforementioned are incapable of addressing its opposition as morally or intellectually valid, contention is their sole motivation.

Off topic, but here. Temperance acts as the foundation for fortitude, fortitude for sophistication, and sophistication for justice; therefore, within the society ridden with injustice, philistine-thinking, cowardice and decadence has reduced itself to the preliminary condition for social life to emerge--that being dissimulation. Essentially, society in this primordial state is merely disguised as a necessary mechanism toward its perpetuation. It contains no values, no customs, no people: all it consists of is its pretentious constitution.

liberals only think about themselves. there is no moral in them, although they always demand communism, which needs a highly moral society to function properly. this is not how social cohesion can exist.

[Orzmund]

What compels the liberal to participate in the system it opposes? Why does the liberal contradict itself by enlisting the aid of democracy?