International Brotherhood of Men

They want control over their lives and desire independence. Yet they will justify control over another human's behavior they do not know but as a stranger?

Normies project and try to correct the behavior of others that they see in themselves. If they can point out the flaws of others, it gives the cathartic feeling of fixing oneself. But they are too ego-driven to admit that the reason they detect such 'character flaw' in a stranger is because they themselves possess it, yes?

They are an oxymoron in a nutshell.
They are and they aren't.

Their words have little meaning and their actions too.

Human normies are disturbing. The most disturbing creature to set foot on Earth.

They have the capabilities to do good which no animal aside from us has, yet they enjoy doing the opposite.
What animal has this trouble? None.

Humans say that animals are beasts and savages. But they do not have a choice.

Humans have a choice.

When you take a look at the killings of many innocent in warfare throughout human history. They had a choice to spare
the child of a family they took as hostage. They had a choice to not rape the mother in front of her family.

But humans being apparently the 'angels' they are choose the latter. They don't want good things to happen.

So it begs the question.
Why.

Why do they want to keep wearing that mask of 'appearing good.' Why do they insist they are 'good.'

Why pretend?

normies are one of the biggest and most serious problems that we all facing. They poison and affect the women and then these women ruin us.

Agreed. I must nap before work; however, I would like to touch on this subject further once well-rested and aptly positioned. Until then, comrade, my own reaffirmations, anecdotes, opinions, and observations in regards to the Normie shall wait to be articulated.

Orzmund wrote: 13 Feb 2025, 15:42 Agreed. I must nap before work; however, I would like to touch on this subject further once well-rested and aptly positioned. Until then, comrade, my own reaffirmations, anecdotes, opinions, and observations in regards to the Normie shall wait to be articulated.

at least you have work unlike some

The Normal Person - The normal person, in his hubris and discontent, is the redolent incarnation of weakness and conformity. He is addled by originality, balks in the face of a greatness superseding banality, peeved by the slightest insinuations of resisted acquiescence or repudiation of his prejudice, disturbed and reticent once fragmented outside perceived commonality; he is the furthest mutation of a moral, conscientious labour observed thus far, yet he bears no burden himself besides the faithful dispassion of completion as an innateness. In distancing himself from every controversy and curiosity, bliss and strangeness, he has alienated the true meaning of thought and feeling to that which befits convenience—nevertheless, he persists to delineate and restrict human experience in its perfection, invariable distinction to wholeness, or even within its imaginary disillusionment, therefore reducing the apparatus of cognition to his mediocrity. Despite what compels or illuminates understanding, growth of character, and self-discipline; no matter how noble, admirable, cursed, or sordid something might appear to be and truly is; regardless of the means to an end and the sequential consequences abiding its principle: our perimeter of awareness, our moral sense and motivation, as well as our very judgmental acumen is utterly squandered in the prescience of normalcy. One would gasp at the crudeness expressed so furtively could they see beneath its mask, and only diffidence could match it in devious slyness having made an instinct of unspoken communication. A woman’s eyelid flutters with flirtatious invitation at the met gaze of her beloved, a child’s nose wrinkles when defiled by a new stench; likewise, the normal instinct crackles, hisses, and sputters poison after it has felt the tantalizing brush of genuineness—whether it be sincere or imitated is inconsequential. It should be questioned “what is typical, necessary, and resolute of normalcy; what is quintessential and commonplace in it?” However, such criticism and inquiry only agitates the corruptible, perverse concept of normalcy, divorcing it incessantly from these categorical and hypothetical classifications—still, the normal person will profess his absolution of opinion and sentiment, neither knowing nor withstanding the brunt of his ignorance.

I didn't realize that, humans have the opportunity to do good deeds but often choose to be evil just for fun.
I want humans to be exterminated.