What is YOUR definition of an INCEL?
Posted: 11 Nov 2024, 15:46
I feel that the word "incel" has been overused to a point it lost its meaning.
Also the original definition lacks context because it doesn't take into consideration men in sexless marriages, or men that resort to escorts or reject single moms because of the fear of being divorce-raped (no pun intended).
Therefore MY definition of an incel is a man unable to get laid ANYTIME he wants (from a nonescort). A man that can get laid whenever he wants is therefore a CHAD.
There are thus TWO categories of the word "incel" in my definition:
#1) Acceptable Incels: Men that are able to get laid via TRANSACTIONAL benefit for the female (see Briffault's Law) but 'does not control his own destiny' of the next time he'll get laid. Acceptable Incels are "tolerable looking" enough for a woman to see herself [eventually] opening her legs to him but not attractive enough for her to get wet over him and find sex as a pleasure. Thus Acceptable Incels have to wait an indefinite period of time to get laid. Those men have to endure INCELDOM during that WAITING period as they're unable to get laid during that time period. Unlike Acceptable Incels, Chads can get sex anytime he wants from his gf and even if she refuses, he can simply call another desperate woman to fuck.
#2) UNacceptable Incels: Men unable to get laid under ANY circumstance regardless of nonsexual benefits he has to provide for the female. These men are usually too physically unattractive and repulsive for women to ever imagine being with him. These men MUST get an escort to get laid. For context I'm a [almost] 40-year old babyface cutecel that looks like a middle-school teenager. Even though I'm not 'repulsive' I am not masculine-looking enough in the face for a woman to see herself opening her legs to me, so TFL for life I shall remain.
Honorable Mentions:
-Men that had 'frequent unlimited' sex in the past and now unable to get laid (i.e. Ron Jeremy, Brandon Frasier) are now UNacceptable Incels. Your past body count means nothing if you can't get a woman to open her legs to you in the present day. Incel status is all about the PRESENT.
-As aformentioned, ASCENSION DOES NOT EXIST. If you had a dry spell and now have a gf, you were ALWAYS an Acceptable Incel. You were just able to find a woman that would date down.
-That being said, men who were 'invisible' to women then all of a sudden are getting laid left and right because of a "glowup" are CHADS and FAKECELS. Being unable to get laid because of laziness and being Stacy-only does not AT ALL constitute inceldom as your bone structures and genetics have said otherwise. Incels are men GENETICALLY tied to physical unattractiveness.
What are your thoughts on Inceldom?
Also the original definition lacks context because it doesn't take into consideration men in sexless marriages, or men that resort to escorts or reject single moms because of the fear of being divorce-raped (no pun intended).
Therefore MY definition of an incel is a man unable to get laid ANYTIME he wants (from a nonescort). A man that can get laid whenever he wants is therefore a CHAD.
There are thus TWO categories of the word "incel" in my definition:
#1) Acceptable Incels: Men that are able to get laid via TRANSACTIONAL benefit for the female (see Briffault's Law) but 'does not control his own destiny' of the next time he'll get laid. Acceptable Incels are "tolerable looking" enough for a woman to see herself [eventually] opening her legs to him but not attractive enough for her to get wet over him and find sex as a pleasure. Thus Acceptable Incels have to wait an indefinite period of time to get laid. Those men have to endure INCELDOM during that WAITING period as they're unable to get laid during that time period. Unlike Acceptable Incels, Chads can get sex anytime he wants from his gf and even if she refuses, he can simply call another desperate woman to fuck.
#2) UNacceptable Incels: Men unable to get laid under ANY circumstance regardless of nonsexual benefits he has to provide for the female. These men are usually too physically unattractive and repulsive for women to ever imagine being with him. These men MUST get an escort to get laid. For context I'm a [almost] 40-year old babyface cutecel that looks like a middle-school teenager. Even though I'm not 'repulsive' I am not masculine-looking enough in the face for a woman to see herself opening her legs to me, so TFL for life I shall remain.
Honorable Mentions:
-Men that had 'frequent unlimited' sex in the past and now unable to get laid (i.e. Ron Jeremy, Brandon Frasier) are now UNacceptable Incels. Your past body count means nothing if you can't get a woman to open her legs to you in the present day. Incel status is all about the PRESENT.
-As aformentioned, ASCENSION DOES NOT EXIST. If you had a dry spell and now have a gf, you were ALWAYS an Acceptable Incel. You were just able to find a woman that would date down.
-That being said, men who were 'invisible' to women then all of a sudden are getting laid left and right because of a "glowup" are CHADS and FAKECELS. Being unable to get laid because of laziness and being Stacy-only does not AT ALL constitute inceldom as your bone structures and genetics have said otherwise. Incels are men GENETICALLY tied to physical unattractiveness.
What are your thoughts on Inceldom?