Page 1 of 1
The myth of violent incels
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 7:30 pm
by Darth_aurelius
In this podcast style recording, I speak about the reasons why incels are unfairly maligned by both the media and the general public on the basis of their misapprehension of crime statistics. I discuss the many reasons why incel men are actually committed to a life of non-violence and why it is unfair, prejudicial and discriminatory towards such men to stigmatize them as either violent criminals or as having an unnatural propensity for violence.
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:24 pm
by General Alek
incels are usually physically weak and incapable of violence and fighting
that's one of the reasons they are incels
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:28 pm
by Darth_aurelius
General Alek wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:24 pm
incels are usually physically weak and incapable of violence and fighting
that's one of the reasons they are incels
Indeed and we must spread this message far and wide so that all normies begin to rightfully consider us as victims and a specialized class of minorities in need of protection and government financial assistance instead of violent, murderous psychopaths.
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:07 am
by Raider919
General Alek wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:24 pm
incels are usually physically weak and incapable of violence and fighting
that's one of the reasons they are incels
you wouldn't believe i was a cel if oyu saw me irl
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:15 am
by General Alek
Raider919 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:07 am
General Alek wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:24 pm
incels are usually physically weak and incapable of violence and fighting
that's one of the reasons they are incels
you wouldn't believe i was a cel if oyu saw me irl
what do you look like?
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:03 pm
by Darth_aurelius
Raider919 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:07 am
General Alek wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:24 pm
incels are usually physically weak and incapable of violence and fighting
that's one of the reasons they are incels
you wouldn't believe i was a cel if oyu saw me irl
I can actually say the same thing about myself as I am 6'3 and 215 lbs as well as heavily musclemaxxed and have been gymmaxxing for more then 20 years now. The horrible irony is that notwithstanding these objectively superior physical attributes as well as my high intelligence, all but landwhales, disgusting meth-head looking hoes and troons express contempt and disdain for me, which just shows how hyperinflated foids sense of entitlement actually is.
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:26 pm
by Gigatruecel
Good podcast.
Sexhavers have committed more violence than incels ever have yet the biased jewish controlled media exaggerates and fear mongers about the actions of a few of us who have reached their breaking point.
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 2:48 pm
by Raider919
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:03 pm
Raider919 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 1:07 am
General Alek wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:24 pm
incels are usually physically weak and incapable of violence and fighting
that's one of the reasons they are incels
you wouldn't believe i was a cel if oyu saw me irl
I can actually say the same thing about myself as I am 6'3 and 215 lbs as well as heavily musclemaxxed and have been gymmaxxing for more then 20 years now. The horrible irony is that notwithstanding these objectively superior physical attributes as well as my high intelligence, all but landwhales, disgusting meth-head looking hoes and troons express contempt and disdain for me, which just shows how hyperinflated foids sense of entitlement actually is.
It's becuase people like us are too fucking good for this soycial sceene where meth troons can obliterate your rep over micro aggressions and you have to give 'victims' free shit or you'reracist
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:37 pm
by Abou Baldiaby
Just curious.
Does this forum denounce violence, incitement to violence and harassment?
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:07 pm
by Darth_aurelius
Abou Baldiaby wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:37 pm
Just curious.
Does this forum denounce violence, incitement to violence and harassment?
It depends. See our forum policies at the bottom of the page as well as the official rules pronouncement in the announcements section for greater clarification. I will say that while the IBM/IPF officially does not promote, encourage or countenance any illegal activity or acts of violence more generally, we do abide by a principle of free speech absolutism and as such, anything less then a criminally actionable threat (one with the requisite specificity in terms of time, place and manner) will be tolerated. E.g., you can say, "I am going to kill all the jews" as that is a very generic statement and not actually feasible but you cannot say, "I am going to kill Abraham Wiesenthal at 200 PM CST on the corner of Main and Elm in Kikesville, USA with a knife", as that qualifies as an actionable threat.
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 6:09 pm
by Abou Baldiaby
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:07 pm
Abou Baldiaby wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:37 pm
Just curious.
Does this forum denounce violence, incitement to violence and harassment?
It depends. See our forum policies at the bottom of the page as well as the official rules pronouncement in the announcements section for greater clarification. I will say that while the IBM/IPF officially does not promote, encourage or countenance any illegal activity or acts of violence more generally, we do abide by a principle of free speech absolutism and as such, anything less then a criminally actionable threat (one with the requisite specificity in terms of time, place and manner) will be tolerated. E.g., you can say, "I am going to kill all the jews" as that is a very generic statement and not actually feasible but you cannot say, "I am going to kill Abraham Wiesenthal at 200 PM CST on the corner of Main and Elm in Kikesville, USA with a knife", as that qualifies as an actionable threat.
Thanks for clarifying.
It's an interesting subject, personally I want the word 'incel' to be neutrally descriptive of a person not getting sex despite wish and effort. Now it's associated with other and more disturbing traits for various reasons, by certain people and certain incels themselves.
I think the more 'militant' and angry incels should have it's own term to avoid confusion and guilt by association for merely sexless dudes.
Re: The myth of violent incels
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 6:16 pm
by VH911
Abou Baldiaby wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 6:09 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:07 pm
Abou Baldiaby wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:37 pm
Just curious.
Does this forum denounce violence, incitement to violence and harassment?
It depends. See our forum policies at the bottom of the page as well as the official rules pronouncement in the announcements section for greater clarification. I will say that while the IBM/IPF officially does not promote, encourage or countenance any illegal activity or acts of violence more generally, we do abide by a principle of free speech absolutism and as such, anything less then a criminally actionable threat (one with the requisite specificity in terms of time, place and manner) will be tolerated. E.g., you can say, "I am going to kill all the jews" as that is a very generic statement and not actually feasible but you cannot say, "I am going to kill Abraham Wiesenthal at 200 PM CST on the corner of Main and Elm in Kikesville, USA with a knife", as that qualifies as an actionable threat.
Thanks for clarifying.
It's an interesting subject, personally I want the word 'incel' to be neutrally descriptive of a person not getting sex despite wish and effort. Now it's associated with other and more disturbing traits for various reasons, by certain people and certain incels themselves.
I think the more 'militant' and angry incels should have it's own term to avoid confusion and guilt by association for merely sexless dudes.
"i am a virgin with rage
"