Any behavior can be natural. Any counter behavior can be natural. Here the topic: https://mensrights.space/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3907
What decides if a behavior is true or not? Simply who wins in practice, the strongest and cleverest and the most cunning and powerful, the most supported in society. If normies are 100k vs 1 incel, and they stomp the incel, then they prove the rule of the normie is true and the rule of the incel is false.
An incel will try coercion, a group of normies "evolved to" (therefore natural) kill incels will defend their own anus and the holes of the foids. Who succeeds in imposing their will determines the outcome. All of this results from appeals to DNA and "natural". The only rule is strength and power.
In a nutshell you learned today why argument called "naturalistic fallacy" tends to be considered trash tier. It can justify anything, it can justify punishment and tyranny. It guides nobody towards building better society with more evolved morals. It simply justifies endless threats of violence and also destroys incels. Because incels are minority. Simple as. youre minority = die in the sewers.
So I purpose to reject rape. Fuck rape. Fuck this shit. It is a self refuting position that harms us.
Incel logic = rule of strength.
-
Sustacel250
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
