Everything I hear from dissident right is known to me.

[Sustacel250]

I mean, all the language from nick fuentes idolatry is known to me since 2 decades.

The idea of "optics" and "overton window" and "punching right" and "vibes and mood" and "narrative control", memes and so on.

This idea was known in the so called "far right" as a political strategy. Its old, and I was reading it in the metapolitics wiki, it was also quoted by anders breivik in his manifesto.

The narrative was also implemented by casapoind in italy, golden dawn in greece, the nordic resistance movement, the spanish falangists. So on.

Basically in my days we knew and called it "right wing gramscism". Because the right was spamming dialog about "cultural marxism" and they developed the cope that they could do the same but on the right wing direction. So the new goal isnt to articulate your positions but its to simply build the ground so that your positions will happen and become thinkable, acceptable and normalized.

So I was wondering if this new nick fuentes idolatry is a rebrand of the old idea. And if so, I think the right wingers demonstrated once more how foolish they are. It is curtis yarwin who said "right wingers are leftists 1 step behind". Because he noticed all right wing ideas are copied from the past leftism. Even inside our incel scene we copy and paste leftism.

We incels use moods of the doomer. Well, doomers was post-industrial communism after 70s. Capitalism realism is the original doomer meme. Right wing doomers are merely a johnny come late imitation, not even a good one.
Alex jones rebranded "anti globalism". Its another rebrand of leftist ideas.
Gianfranco Fini in my country rebranded "the resistance".
And nick fuentes rebranded "young and radical".

Can right wingers innovate for once? Apparently not.

So the flaw of this new right wing gramscism in my perspective is vulgarization and populism. Original leftist gramscism is elitist, its also called "elitist marxism". The idea is the cultural elite should do united front tactics, not the pleb. Right wing instead relies on the pleb.

Instead of dominating intellectual journals and think tanks and writing essays and philosophy and doing long term cultural work, the right focuses on fleeting moods and vibes on social media. So the right wing is based on fleeting emotions that dont stand the test of time, and every idea is lost in the digital sands of the internet. Everything can be rebuilt as if a castle of sand. Nothing will last out of this vulgar right wing attempt at gramscism. I think its their main flaw, it shows a structural inability of the right wing to comprehend the left strategy.

The left instead was hierarchical and aristocratic. When left engaged in mood and vibe, it was the last step of their strategy. Right wing is plebeian, it is based on mood vibe and "relatable experiences" and parasocial bros. But what is beyond parasocial bros and "relatable experience"? Answer = nothing. Theres nothing beyond just a mass of swindled dupes who believe in something because is "relatable".

In other words, left wing gramscism = emanation of authority. From the top to the bottom. Its an aristocratic spirit.
Rigth wing gramscism = comes from the anus of the population, and remains feces, it has no way to rise up.