personally i think land can be won or lost.

[Sustacel250]

Theres no original owner of a land. For instance in my country now they do etruscan revival because greeks and later roman took italy from muh native etruscans.

But its so fucking stupid pathetic. Etruscans sure took the land from someone else. How much do they want to go back recursively? Maybe the historians discover etruscans oppressed someone else, and then what? we going to discuss whos the primitive ape that took over the first settlement of homo-sapiens?

But obviously the idea of calling someone a "colonizer" is a disguise to hide an anti-western agenda. I just find it all so insane, how is it possible that university professors supposedly "intelligent" participate in anti colonialism type of narrative? How is that even conceivable that someone of that level of intelligence reasons in that manner.

Muh america bad, muh france bad, muh belgium bad muh england bad. I find it pathetic. Its so stupid. And why they never utter a word about africa? I maen that continent literally is full of bloodshed and people cultures got erased and rewritten all the tme. Its always muh european bad.