Cross-manuresphere coop
Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 05:11
I would like to set standards and limits of coop with other male groups.
I do not wish to impose these limits, I merely limit myself explaining my criteria and maybe you agree or not. I am simply saying I am willing to coop with other groups on specific things we may share in common.
With MGTOW i can share the criticism of feminism, the descriptions of karen behavior I found useful, the problems with feminist tribunals, and what they call "divorce raped" experience. I think every single MGTOW man that was divorce raped deserves compensation payed collectively by women. And I think a society has primary role to enforce property rights so when MGTOWs got screwed we should examine their case and eventually give them a compensation (payed by women). I agree with parts of the descriptions around gynocracy, and I like that MGTOW is also critical of marriage.
Where I set the limits is if a MGTOW wishes to impose his ideology, like for example they like libertarianism or christianity. That is unnecessary ideological baggage. I dont wish to be christian, that is completely unnecessary. I disagree with their "woman nature" arguments,they are also unnecessary baggage. I dont like alpha-beta pseudoscience and I dont want to hear about hypergamy. I simply focus on commonalities, these useless expositions of "female nature" are utterly pointless.
With the trannies I like to find in common the anti-TERF attitude, the anti-conservative attitude. I like their way of expressing their individuality and their experiments to create new families and also I support their idea of transhumanism. Where I utterly disagree is the whole LGBT political group, I dont like their communism which is unfortunately prevalent in the trans groups I visited. Communism is as unnecessary as christianity is, its completely pointless and does not deals with issues. Some tranies are pro-feminist, I disagree with them, feminism I think should be opposed.
ProMaleCollective. I agree with their approach, their international tendency allowed them to contact chinese, indians, mexicans. Their attitude is awesome when it comes to describing shortcomings of the manuresphere. I also think they have their ideology under control. Their leaders are known to me, I know them sicne 10 years. I know the leader is a leninist, but hes mature enough to not let his ideology pollute his anti-feminist pursuits. I ensure you hes focused like a laser and antifeminism is his first priority, leninism comes second.
What I dont think can be supported is their anti-nazi attitude, because lots of men are internet nazis. I know it sounds absurd to say but we gotta open doors to internet nazis, debrainwash them and pull them out of the nazi psyop. Nobody else will do it, only we can do it. What we can have in common is antifeminism, pro-male stances like opposing male genital mutilation and so on. Theres very little compromise to do.
With conservatives I would do zero compromise. I would disagree with 99.999% of everything they do, I will destroy all their philosophy, their narration of history, their entire worldview has to be demolished. Their objectives are utterly anti-incel, anti-male, and they rely too much on electronic celebrities and "the good of the party" above whats right to do in life which is opposing feminim. If they can do "the good of the party" by building an alliance with feminists they will, they already did it. So I will not align with any conservative ever.
With PUA and mass approachers Id like to share general criticism of women. If they are willing to abandon their utterly false explanations of woman behavior and merely focus on single issues like divorces and feminist tribunals, then they can be reasoned with. If they instead want to sell you courses or sell you their useless not-needed ideas about "woman nature" then they cannot be reasoned with. Some people want to convince themselves the reality as they see it is accurate. Such is the case for PUAs they simply like to live a delusion where women are made in a specific way and they "understand women". In reality they are fooled by women. And women arent weak, they are manipulating these fools. So the only coop you can do with a PUA is if you force him to focus on a single issue. Make him single minded, the PUA will be responsive and will help you.
Lookismcels. I would like to support lookismcels by enhancing medical healthcare. Meaning, we should all have access to free surgery if they are health related. If the surgery is simply to make you look "like a chad" then no fuck you. Also I reject the notion of ascension, looksmaxing, lookmatch. No looksmatch, this is absolutely stupid. So if lookismcels abandon their ascension and their validation gynocentric concepts, I can share some commonality, else they can die in the shitter. I also think we have to bully them so they stop doing the online mogging battles, and they become more sane.
There are other groups but I didnt interact with all of them. Obviously whats true for all these groups is we gotta develop a method to suppress the reproduction of the underclass and promote the smart elements in each of these groups.
I do not wish to impose these limits, I merely limit myself explaining my criteria and maybe you agree or not. I am simply saying I am willing to coop with other groups on specific things we may share in common.
With MGTOW i can share the criticism of feminism, the descriptions of karen behavior I found useful, the problems with feminist tribunals, and what they call "divorce raped" experience. I think every single MGTOW man that was divorce raped deserves compensation payed collectively by women. And I think a society has primary role to enforce property rights so when MGTOWs got screwed we should examine their case and eventually give them a compensation (payed by women). I agree with parts of the descriptions around gynocracy, and I like that MGTOW is also critical of marriage.
Where I set the limits is if a MGTOW wishes to impose his ideology, like for example they like libertarianism or christianity. That is unnecessary ideological baggage. I dont wish to be christian, that is completely unnecessary. I disagree with their "woman nature" arguments,they are also unnecessary baggage. I dont like alpha-beta pseudoscience and I dont want to hear about hypergamy. I simply focus on commonalities, these useless expositions of "female nature" are utterly pointless.
With the trannies I like to find in common the anti-TERF attitude, the anti-conservative attitude. I like their way of expressing their individuality and their experiments to create new families and also I support their idea of transhumanism. Where I utterly disagree is the whole LGBT political group, I dont like their communism which is unfortunately prevalent in the trans groups I visited. Communism is as unnecessary as christianity is, its completely pointless and does not deals with issues. Some tranies are pro-feminist, I disagree with them, feminism I think should be opposed.
ProMaleCollective. I agree with their approach, their international tendency allowed them to contact chinese, indians, mexicans. Their attitude is awesome when it comes to describing shortcomings of the manuresphere. I also think they have their ideology under control. Their leaders are known to me, I know them sicne 10 years. I know the leader is a leninist, but hes mature enough to not let his ideology pollute his anti-feminist pursuits. I ensure you hes focused like a laser and antifeminism is his first priority, leninism comes second.
What I dont think can be supported is their anti-nazi attitude, because lots of men are internet nazis. I know it sounds absurd to say but we gotta open doors to internet nazis, debrainwash them and pull them out of the nazi psyop. Nobody else will do it, only we can do it. What we can have in common is antifeminism, pro-male stances like opposing male genital mutilation and so on. Theres very little compromise to do.
With conservatives I would do zero compromise. I would disagree with 99.999% of everything they do, I will destroy all their philosophy, their narration of history, their entire worldview has to be demolished. Their objectives are utterly anti-incel, anti-male, and they rely too much on electronic celebrities and "the good of the party" above whats right to do in life which is opposing feminim. If they can do "the good of the party" by building an alliance with feminists they will, they already did it. So I will not align with any conservative ever.
With PUA and mass approachers Id like to share general criticism of women. If they are willing to abandon their utterly false explanations of woman behavior and merely focus on single issues like divorces and feminist tribunals, then they can be reasoned with. If they instead want to sell you courses or sell you their useless not-needed ideas about "woman nature" then they cannot be reasoned with. Some people want to convince themselves the reality as they see it is accurate. Such is the case for PUAs they simply like to live a delusion where women are made in a specific way and they "understand women". In reality they are fooled by women. And women arent weak, they are manipulating these fools. So the only coop you can do with a PUA is if you force him to focus on a single issue. Make him single minded, the PUA will be responsive and will help you.
Lookismcels. I would like to support lookismcels by enhancing medical healthcare. Meaning, we should all have access to free surgery if they are health related. If the surgery is simply to make you look "like a chad" then no fuck you. Also I reject the notion of ascension, looksmaxing, lookmatch. No looksmatch, this is absolutely stupid. So if lookismcels abandon their ascension and their validation gynocentric concepts, I can share some commonality, else they can die in the shitter. I also think we have to bully them so they stop doing the online mogging battles, and they become more sane.
There are other groups but I didnt interact with all of them. Obviously whats true for all these groups is we gotta develop a method to suppress the reproduction of the underclass and promote the smart elements in each of these groups.