Why people cant admire beauty?

[Sustacel250]

I mean, I like stacies, Im not really "admiring beauty", to be honest is more like a porn stimulation. I simply like hot girls.

I heard when I was younger, this idea if a woman likes a chad she is "shallow". I was already protesting, because whats shallow about it? I mean, normies really pretend to dictate norms in behavior but we as humans didnt yet discover what in our DNA and psychology dictates human behavior.

Choices and aesthetic preferences turns out are far more complex than normies assume. When a girl likes a chad, what happening is a very deep complex situation where her biofoid human brain makes calculations that makes her conclude chad is the optimal partner for her.

And when I jack off to stacies, I dont know what happens. I would presume that my brain is addicted to the release of semen. I have the goal of inseminating some attractive high value woman, which is why I always jack off to the staciest of the girls on social media.

In my youth culture it was also said is "shallow" of men to prefer attractive girls. And it was told that if you like big tits youre misogynist. Feminists also did studies on this topic because tit size insecurity is big in the woman population.

The model of attractiveness promoted by my culture was intellectual attraction, the idea you are supposed to fascinate a woman with meeting of the minds, or intellectual fascination or domination. Intellectual domination is this idea you read in the nabokov book, where humbert humbert will attempt to show off his intellectual superior status to a woman, and the woman would fall for his sweet lies. Now, in my culture it was said this is all more legitimate because you get pussy thanks to the fruits of your intellect, and you have "merit" for "conquering a woman".

But I always disagreed. First off, I noticed the stereotype about chads being less intelligent was fake. Science demonstrated that people with symmetric features on the face have a greater intellect. Also, chads are more humble about their own intellect, chads do not care about it nor they use it for something. Chads rarely use their intelligence and I think is super likely a chad will become a doctor, but very unlikely a chad will be pushed upward in science. Our culture simply is not made for chads to express their intellective potential. I always felt in my life that our culture is running an incel coping mechanism to protect the ego and social status of the incels.

Obviously if women love chads is as it should be, and my culture was wrong. Intellectual types are all stupid. In my country, intellectual men are all coming from humanities background. Chads study scientific subjects. Whos smarter? Chads are of course. And if women prefer chads, they are are also preferring someone with greater intellect. So are they really "shallow"? Whos shallow now? Normies who live a lie thinking intellectualmaxing gives them a right to dominate women, or chads who simply rely on objective facts such as their good looks and higher intelligence? Who is shallow?

Or, think of me. Am I shallow? I jizz for women who are attractive and I exclude unattractive ugly women. As turns out, these attractive women I keep jizzing are also quite intelligent. Stacies are doctors, high status managers, women gifted with intelligence. And as a misogynist I am also capable to go against them, unlike many others. Many men fear confrontations with women, not me, I love to face women, win against them. But sometimes I lose.

I think being attracted to stacies and chads is completely OK and our culture is fake and stupid. We are sacrificing the talents of chads and stacies, and all for what? To protect the sensibilities of bottom feeder incels? Who gives a fuck. I am incel as well I will always recommend to not bother me, I am not offended if chads and stacies exist. Other incels maybe feel offended but is their problem, I call them normies.