Libertarian micropenis argument.

[Sustacel250]

Libertarians are known for having "provocative" ideas like "what if he has a micro penis".

The problem of abuse is that size of your genitals dont matter. While is true that micro penises at times cannot even penetrate a victim, the problem of rape is that is all about exploitation. If a kid cannot consent, it does not matters if the rapist had a micro penis.

Epstein network worked because of wealth and corruption, so it does not matters if Trump had a micro penis or not. Some of these rich people were burning the genitals of kids, even if Trump has a micro penis its literally not relevant.

These libertarian arguments are merely stupid games to make abuse sound "innocent" or some sort of impossibility. "what if the abuser had a micro penis, would it still be rape?" What sort of logic is that? Abuse is defined by harm not by the size of a micro penis. And yes I do not doubt that trump is a senile boomer with a micro penis that is also flaccid, this part of the libertarian argument may be true. But its still silly.

The libertarian argument is not even an argument, its more like a misdirection.