Maybe we can reconsider the idea of looksmatch

[Sustacel250]

Personally I dont believe in communism and redistribution. I dont think is even possible.

If you start doing things scientifically, it may be you end up not even achieving the result you wanted and instead of giving pussy to incels you give it to chad. Because, what if you use a meter that simply considers everyone currently not getting pussy? You would discover the % of volcels is several times greater than you anticipated.

David Gandy was virgin at age 21. While a ton of incels start complaining about sexlessness at age 16, and they get pussy at 17 and sill complain about it. Complaining on the internet is not a measure of anything. And what you self report has been shown over and over to be fake.

Dick size self reports are all fake, race based preferences are fake if self reported, attractiveness studies are fake too unless they measure arousal. Self report is a shit method, its like the method of torture where you say anything the person interviewing you wants to hear.

This is where the thinking of Jordan Peterson shows to be superior compared to looksmatching from lookism community. Peterson specifically advocated against the redistribution of partners and he said marriage and enforced monogamy is best deal possible, but other than him there isnt any academic who is willing to support this lunacy. Except paragon who is an academic but for some reason the lookists decided to ignore him.

Research on sexlessness usually relies on large-scale surveys like the U.S. General Social Survey (GSS), which tracks self-reported sexual activity over time. And they include people who are voluntarily abstinent for religious reasons, or they are asexual or they focused on career (this part of the population is bigger than you can imagine). There are people who simply dont have sex unless they are in a relationship this is also a huge portion of people, so if normies are not in a relationshit they will be sexless and for prolonged periods as well, over 2 or 3 or more years. Incels on the forums incorrectly assume whoever is not having sex is "Incel" just like they are.
Incels on a forum think that sexless people automatically agree with incel ideatons on a forum, and if sexless people disagree then incels on a forum will call them "cucks" or "bluepilled". Incels on a forum at times complain and say we have to spread "the blackpill" so that these other sexless people will acquire the same cult mentality of the forum and agree with incel solutions.

The potential incel community has for failure is immense. Because all our "incel science" is based on self reports from online forums, where we do extreme levels of self-selection, we select ourselves so brutally not even stacies would be able to do a comparable job. We motivate reasoning with ideas like "validation" and "ascension", that pollute almost any semblance of science in our groups, almost defeating the purpose of redistribution in a contorted self-refuting endeavor. If what you want is "validation" or "ascension" then redistribution is the opposite of that, it treats women as a resource to give, and validation has to be internal for that to work.
Validation is about recognition, status, being chosen voluntarily, being seen as desirable. Ascension is this idea of fitting-in, being socially acceptable, having the warm embrace of a woman, feeling wanted. All of this contrasts with the idea of redistribution.

For instance, when you redistribute food you dont give meaning and validatoin and ascension to the poor, you just give food. If you distribute food you measure effects like hunger is reduced, calories are being delivered, survival improves. It does not produces status, meaning, social recognition, sense of earning your bread, it simply fixes a problem like "a patch" and if you give food to people you are not even teaching them how to get food by themselves they become even more dependent than before. Basically the people receive food because intervention. You get allocated food, you didnt produce it. You required assistance, you were not validated at all, you were helped.

Now, the reason why I do this analogy is because pussy redistribution is an insane idea that treats women as i they are a resource. This idea is so asinine no communist ever promoted it. No christian either. Communists at the very best encouraged feminists to spread pussy. And christians send their daughters around to capture people with the smell of pussy. And thats it, these 2 groups (chrsitians and communists) are the most inclined to redistribute resources, yet none of the 2 would ever dare to distribute women.

Another problem is we have no control group. If you go into a bodybuilding forum, you will conclude everyone benches 180kg. If you go in an incel forum, you conclude everyone is obsessed over validation. If you go in a feminist community you will conclude everyone is victim of rape.

Inside incel community, everyone who solves their problem leaves, and they perceive no attachment to the incel identity. People who are frustrated (like me) post more, and change the course of the community. Loudest and most relatable people are the most listened to, which is why we had to suffer BrendioEEE, Knajjd and Fat link and his army of nude femcels. In a situation like this, we need someone external to figure out whats happening. Because we are unreliable as fuck.

I think we should probably reconsider the idea of looksmatch. I tell you more, I disagree with it ideologically. Till here I simply showed the impossibility, but if it was possible I would disagree because of ideological reasons. I do not agree with victimism, equality and redistribution. I agree with redistribution only in some areas of life, like healthcare housing, job planning, university (status redistribution), information (spreading of culture), skills. Not sex. I disagree about sex redistribution.

I do like public healthcare. But I dont like this idea of distribution of sex. As I said, I think a huge portion of sexless people would also disagree, because these data misinterpreted by incels on a forum do not show the % of self identified incels they show simply all the people who dont have sex and probably they have very good reasons to not have sex. For instance in any random seminary most males will not have sex, and none of them will want you to give them a woman to fuck. I wouldnt want that either, i dont want a "looksmatch" even if in my case it would be quite a pretty girl if you matched me with some girl equivalent in looks. But I have reasons to be incel, its not that I want validation or ascension I am waaay past that.