Theres this trend of the age-disparity
Posted: 06 Feb 2026, 04:41
I find it really distasteful there is this broad trend of seeing older male younger woman age-diff relationships as a "bad thing".
Same people who posture as "moral" on the internet, often highlight the following issues: raise of autism in younger generations, childlessness and population replacement issues, raise in mental illnesses in younger age ranges, raise of pharma consumption, lowering of attention span in younger gens, housing crysis, older people lack caregiver services, economy shrinks and is at risk, people got less money, immigration replaces the natives, failure to transmit morals and education on the new gen.
And more problems.
But at the same time, the people focused on this set of issues, also shouts against "the pedos". For context, the idea of "a pedo" has been conveyed on social media as this broad category of men who find younger women attractive. I mean, younger women aged from 14-24, the age of fertility and sex. When normies talk about "pedos" they are not talking about people who are insane and want to hurt kids they are merely talking of normal people who find young women attractive.
Another issue is all of us men are struggling. Before we have enough resources to grant a future to a baby, or have a house a car and a stable income, we will all be older. How much older? dont know. Some of us will be 30 some will be 40, some 50 and some will never make it, or will die trying. Which means before we can even start thinking about having kids, we gotta solve a lot of other problems. And by avg, most of us will be older before we got stuff in order. Some genius kids will be rich and ready for family at age 20, because maybe they got a genius move and they became tech billionaires, good for them. But the rest of us will not be like this. Rest of us will be poor in shambles for a long portion of our adult life.
Which means when we will be older lets say around 30, we will want to meet a nice 16 yold woman who is fertile, spam 5 kids and fix the next generation so they will not have to struggle like we did. This would fix a huge portion of the issues we had in present days.
But for some reason, the same people aware of the issues, are also those spamming this updated feminist definition of pedophilia, so they will also be those who self-select for the removal. The genes of these "anti-paedos" will not pass. They self selected for erasure. people who have kids will pass their genes.
Same people who posture as "moral" on the internet, often highlight the following issues: raise of autism in younger generations, childlessness and population replacement issues, raise in mental illnesses in younger age ranges, raise of pharma consumption, lowering of attention span in younger gens, housing crysis, older people lack caregiver services, economy shrinks and is at risk, people got less money, immigration replaces the natives, failure to transmit morals and education on the new gen.
And more problems.
But at the same time, the people focused on this set of issues, also shouts against "the pedos". For context, the idea of "a pedo" has been conveyed on social media as this broad category of men who find younger women attractive. I mean, younger women aged from 14-24, the age of fertility and sex. When normies talk about "pedos" they are not talking about people who are insane and want to hurt kids they are merely talking of normal people who find young women attractive.
Another issue is all of us men are struggling. Before we have enough resources to grant a future to a baby, or have a house a car and a stable income, we will all be older. How much older? dont know. Some of us will be 30 some will be 40, some 50 and some will never make it, or will die trying. Which means before we can even start thinking about having kids, we gotta solve a lot of other problems. And by avg, most of us will be older before we got stuff in order. Some genius kids will be rich and ready for family at age 20, because maybe they got a genius move and they became tech billionaires, good for them. But the rest of us will not be like this. Rest of us will be poor in shambles for a long portion of our adult life.
Which means when we will be older lets say around 30, we will want to meet a nice 16 yold woman who is fertile, spam 5 kids and fix the next generation so they will not have to struggle like we did. This would fix a huge portion of the issues we had in present days.
But for some reason, the same people aware of the issues, are also those spamming this updated feminist definition of pedophilia, so they will also be those who self-select for the removal. The genes of these "anti-paedos" will not pass. They self selected for erasure. people who have kids will pass their genes.