All normies are invested in their porn identity
Posted: 26 Jan 2026, 09:52
For some reason I seem to b one of the few humans alive able to keep my porn identity as a separated part of my personality. Im into hentai, but not one specific genre, it happens I go around various copes in the hentai world. I didnt really focus too much on one subgenre, im mostly into artists that I like whatever they are doing at the moment.
For normies, seems like their porn life is their personality. They mix the 2 things. For instance I remember when william wrote of his visit to the psychologist. She asked him whats his role in BDSM. He had no reply because he was not even into BDSM.
I had similar interactions with fetid normies, they would project on me some BDSM related cope and I couldnt relate. I have no role like that in my daily incel life. For instance, discussing with the trannies I noticed they refer to each other using sexual personality types they say one is bottom another one is top. They have a sexualized personality, they refer to themselves with roles in a sexual context but they carry their porn personality outside of porn.
Gay people act and behave in society same as they would act and behave in the bedroom. If one of them is "alpha muscle daddy" he will have the same cope in the gym, and he will try posture as a "gay bear daddy" even with random people. So we will look at him and we will know, he is a gay basically.
And normie women, will do the same. They will make it evident if they are beta sissy MK ultra programmed or if they are assertive dommy mommy whatever. They carry their sexual identity in their daily interactions seemingly unable to behave appropriately in non-porn contexts.
What these normies show me with their porn personality is that feminist theory was fake. Back in the times where we were not invaded by indians.is we had some squabbles with feminists. We said all women are attracted to psychos, and women like serial killers. Feminists told us that what happens in the bed should not be for us a reason to judge a woman. For instance if a woman has anal passive sex, we should not consider her an "useless slave". Because that woman according to feminism was performing a sexual role in the privacy of her bed. But we have no right (according to feminism) to judge poorly a woman for her anal cavity expansion habits.
What I noticed instead with my private unscientific incel observations is that women definitely do carry their sexual porn personality outside of the bed. So we incels used sociosexual interpretations to describe these desecrated foids around us. We thought if a foid is a sexual slave taking dicks up the butt, she surely should not be in politics because shes a submissive bitch. Obviously for feminists this is a taboo, they dont want you to think a competent leader should not take dicks up the ass. The feminists also tell us to not judge a woman by the number of sexual partners. Apparently they can judge me for lack of sexual partners but is another story.
What I can say about this situation is normies have artificial personalities which is why I call them robotoids. The normies do not really see sex as a private enjoyment and cannot have a social personality detached from their porn enjoyment. For the normies porn = real life their real personality. They dont have a concept of separating contexts. If normies are into these BDSM retarded plays in porn, they will carry them thru in real life. Some people out there will expect you to be a complacent sexual partner in a BDSM artificial porn personality. Its not going to be about sexual kink rather it will be all about fulfilling the artificial personality of a normie.
It appears the only people aware enough to not inflict porn on others is us incels. I would never go around inflicting my porn on younger generations for instance. Why would I do that? So I can reproduce artificially some of my sexual kinks? Who cares im incel I wanna get real babies not altered fetishes like trannies and women are doing. Sexualizing kids should be abolished as a practice I really am against it.
For normies, seems like their porn life is their personality. They mix the 2 things. For instance I remember when william wrote of his visit to the psychologist. She asked him whats his role in BDSM. He had no reply because he was not even into BDSM.
I had similar interactions with fetid normies, they would project on me some BDSM related cope and I couldnt relate. I have no role like that in my daily incel life. For instance, discussing with the trannies I noticed they refer to each other using sexual personality types they say one is bottom another one is top. They have a sexualized personality, they refer to themselves with roles in a sexual context but they carry their porn personality outside of porn.
Gay people act and behave in society same as they would act and behave in the bedroom. If one of them is "alpha muscle daddy" he will have the same cope in the gym, and he will try posture as a "gay bear daddy" even with random people. So we will look at him and we will know, he is a gay basically.
And normie women, will do the same. They will make it evident if they are beta sissy MK ultra programmed or if they are assertive dommy mommy whatever. They carry their sexual identity in their daily interactions seemingly unable to behave appropriately in non-porn contexts.
What these normies show me with their porn personality is that feminist theory was fake. Back in the times where we were not invaded by indians.is we had some squabbles with feminists. We said all women are attracted to psychos, and women like serial killers. Feminists told us that what happens in the bed should not be for us a reason to judge a woman. For instance if a woman has anal passive sex, we should not consider her an "useless slave". Because that woman according to feminism was performing a sexual role in the privacy of her bed. But we have no right (according to feminism) to judge poorly a woman for her anal cavity expansion habits.
What I noticed instead with my private unscientific incel observations is that women definitely do carry their sexual porn personality outside of the bed. So we incels used sociosexual interpretations to describe these desecrated foids around us. We thought if a foid is a sexual slave taking dicks up the butt, she surely should not be in politics because shes a submissive bitch. Obviously for feminists this is a taboo, they dont want you to think a competent leader should not take dicks up the ass. The feminists also tell us to not judge a woman by the number of sexual partners. Apparently they can judge me for lack of sexual partners but is another story.
What I can say about this situation is normies have artificial personalities which is why I call them robotoids. The normies do not really see sex as a private enjoyment and cannot have a social personality detached from their porn enjoyment. For the normies porn = real life their real personality. They dont have a concept of separating contexts. If normies are into these BDSM retarded plays in porn, they will carry them thru in real life. Some people out there will expect you to be a complacent sexual partner in a BDSM artificial porn personality. Its not going to be about sexual kink rather it will be all about fulfilling the artificial personality of a normie.
It appears the only people aware enough to not inflict porn on others is us incels. I would never go around inflicting my porn on younger generations for instance. Why would I do that? So I can reproduce artificially some of my sexual kinks? Who cares im incel I wanna get real babies not altered fetishes like trannies and women are doing. Sexualizing kids should be abolished as a practice I really am against it.