International Brotherhood of Men

I do I want to see all the Chad's and Staceys get annihilated followed by normies then feminists and cuckservatives.

Unfortunately, we would be in trouble aswell

I dont. Europe didnt fully recover from the past wars. The genes decayed a lot. Survivor boomers gave birth to antisocial genetically inferior zoomers.

If this dysgenic trend goes on there will be even more inceldom in the future.

If the contemporary incels reproduce, the next generation will be even lower IQ and more dysgenic and less moral.

Its a thing nobody wants to hear but I firmly belive in eugenics and castrating incels basically. Including myself if is necessary. I dont want to see the world burn, theres to many antisocials already. normies are wicked already I dont want to see them getting even worse.

General Alek wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 02:13 Unfortunately, we would be in trouble aswell

That is true but I really don't have much to live for so why not watch the rest of the world suffer? I think that World War Three might be a good thing for incels especially those who are NEET and bored all the time like myself. We may not necessarily need to be drafted in order to experience excitement. We could do it in other ways watching the Chad's and staceys, feminists and cuckservatives get annihilated and we could provide auxiliary support to the annihilators or just watch from the sidelines as spectators as if we were at a movie theater with a bucket of popcorn and a soda. for us it would be very entertaining

Sustacel250 wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 03:34 I dont. Europe didnt fully recover from the past wars. The genes decayed a lot. Survivor boomers gave birth to antisocial genetically inferior zoomers.

If this dysgenic trend goes on there will be even more inceldom in the future.

If the contemporary incels reproduce, the next generation will be even lower IQ and more dysgenic and less moral.

Its a thing nobody wants to hear but I firmly belive in eugenics and castrating incels basically. Including myself if is necessary. I dont want to see the world burn, theres to many antisocials already. normies are wicked already I dont want to see them getting even worse.

Which is World War Three could be the perfect solution for the chads staceys feminists and all of other enemies being subjected to horror and suffering while we watched from the sidelines with a bucket of popcorn and a soda. Or we provide the annihilators with auxiliary support.

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 19 Jan 2026, 16:28 I do I want to see all the Chad's and Staceys get annihilated followed by normies then feminists and cuckservatives.

If you read or listen to any of the stuff that is put out by the people who are paying the most attention to existential (civilizational) risk and who are well qualified to be rendering informed opinions, you will see that we are terrifyingly close to the precipice of destruction. The theoretical "doomsday clock" is now closer to midnight then ever it was before, even more so then during the height of the Cold War and the standoff between the cucked US and the glorious USSR over Soviet missile deployments in Cuba. The infrastructure that we are using to manage and maintain our land based ICBM's is decrepit and decaying and is highly susceptible to critical failure and/or hacking. Also, we have a literal madman in the oven office whose insane vituperations and erratic behavior make nuclear exchange far more likely then it had been under any previous incumbent excepting maybe the last drink sodden months of Nixon's presidency.

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 17:25 Which is World War Three could be the perfect solution for the chads staceys feminists and all of other enemies being subjected to horror and suffering while we watched from the sidelines with a bucket of popcorn and a soda. Or we provide the annihilators with auxiliary support.

why would I want all chads dead? so my country gets even worse? so it gets replaced by brown people. Well im not insane so no thanks

Darth_aurelius wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 19:24

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 19 Jan 2026, 16:28 I do I want to see all the Chad's and Staceys get annihilated followed by normies then feminists and cuckservatives.

If you read or listen to any of the stuff that is put out by the people who are paying the most attention to existential (civilizational) risk and who are well qualified to be rendering informed opinions, you will see that we are terrifyingly close to the precipice of destruction. The theoretical "doomsday clock" is now closer to midnight then ever it was before, even more so then during the height of the Cold War and the standoff between the cucked US and the glorious USSR over Soviet missile deployments in Cuba. The infrastructure that we are using to manage and maintain our land based ICBM's is decrepit and decaying and is highly susceptible to critical failure and/or hacking. Also, we have a literal madman in the oven office whose insane vituperations and erratic behavior make nuclear exchange far more likely then it had been under any previous incumbent excepting maybe the last drink sodden months of Nixon's presidency.

I have been listening and we have all heard similar sentiment over the years when Trump was elected in 2016. When the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were launched. When the Russia Ukraine war was launched the Israell Hamas war was launched two years ago. When the War on Terror was launched after the concept a "New Pearl Harbor" materialized in the form of 9/11.

Everyone at that time was certain World War Three was on the horizon but it did not materialize so even with the current events going on it might be hard to say this is the beginning of World War Three.

Sustacel250 wrote: 21 Jan 2026, 03:18

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 17:25 Which is World War Three could be the perfect solution for the chads staceys feminists and all of other enemies being subjected to horror and suffering while we watched from the sidelines with a bucket of popcorn and a soda. Or we provide the annihilators with auxiliary support.

why would I want all chads dead? so my country gets even worse? so it gets replaced by brown people. Well im not insane so no thanks

Asylum seekers are a concern for everyone everywhere but it does not mean they contribute whole heartedly and comprise 90 percent of societal collapse as there are numerous other factors that contribute to it.

Seeing Chad's suffer will bring us all joy as they have been living fun filled lives and it would their turn to endure brutality.

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 21 Jan 2026, 10:26

Darth_aurelius wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 19:24

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 19 Jan 2026, 16:28 I do I want to see all the Chad's and Staceys get annihilated followed by normies then feminists and cuckservatives.

If you read or listen to any of the stuff that is put out by the people who are paying the most attention to existential (civilizational) risk and who are well qualified to be rendering informed opinions, you will see that we are terrifyingly close to the precipice of destruction. The theoretical "doomsday clock" is now closer to midnight then ever it was before, even more so then during the height of the Cold War and the standoff between the cucked US and the glorious USSR over Soviet missile deployments in Cuba. The infrastructure that we are using to manage and maintain our land based ICBM's is decrepit and decaying and is highly susceptible to critical failure and/or hacking. Also, we have a literal madman in the oven office whose insane vituperations and erratic behavior make nuclear exchange far more likely then it had been under any previous incumbent excepting maybe the last drink sodden months of Nixon's presidency.

I have been listening and we have all heard similar sentiment over the years when Trump was elected in 2016. When the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were launched. When the Russia Ukraine war was launched the Israell Hamas war was launched two years ago. When the War on Terror was launched after the concept a "New Pearl Harbor" materialized in the form of 9/11.

Everyone at that time was certain World War Three was on the horizon but it did not materialize so even with the current events going on it might be hard to say this is the beginning of World War Three.

Indeed and all of those historical facts certainly enter into the calculus which influences the probability of some cascading series of events that will result in global nuclear proliferation. The ambient level of existential threat has increased exponentially since the end of the Cold War since now instead of two global superpowers held in a condition of perpetual stasis by virtue of the mutually assured destruction paradigm, we have many nuclear armed nations, several of which are far more eager and willing to deploy their arsenals. The recent conventional warfare between the honorable Islamic forces of Pakistan and the degenerate, foul smelling wretched pajeets of india in Pakistan had the potential to escalate to the point of use of tactical nuclear weapons. This sort of conflict would not have materialized in the geopolitical culture of the Cold War as the western and Soviet proxy states would have been constrained by their respective overlords and would have lacked sufficient sovereign agency to act unilaterally.

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 21 Jan 2026, 10:29 Seeing Chad's suffer will bring us all joy as they have been living fun filled lives and it would their turn to endure brutality.

no i dont want chad to suffer because I dont care about his life. Also i dont want to be a victim if hes better than me so be it. Who cares, im also better than chads in several ways.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 21 Jan 2026, 10:39

SonOfElliotRodger wrote: 21 Jan 2026, 10:26

Darth_aurelius wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 19:24


If you read or listen to any of the stuff that is put out by the people who are paying the most attention to existential (civilizational) risk and who are well qualified to be rendering informed opinions, you will see that we are terrifyingly close to the precipice of destruction. The theoretical "doomsday clock" is now closer to midnight then ever it was before, even more so then during the height of the Cold War and the standoff between the cucked US and the glorious USSR over Soviet missile deployments in Cuba. The infrastructure that we are using to manage and maintain our land based ICBM's is decrepit and decaying and is highly susceptible to critical failure and/or hacking. Also, we have a literal madman in the oven office whose insane vituperations and erratic behavior make nuclear exchange far more likely then it had been under any previous incumbent excepting maybe the last drink sodden months of Nixon's presidency.

I have been listening and we have all heard similar sentiment over the years when Trump was elected in 2016. When the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were launched. When the Russia Ukraine war was launched the Israell Hamas war was launched two years ago. When the War on Terror was launched after the concept a "New Pearl Harbor" materialized in the form of 9/11.

Everyone at that time was certain World War Three was on the horizon but it did not materialize so even with the current events going on it might be hard to say this is the beginning of World War Three.

Indeed and all of those historical facts certainly enter into the calculus which influences the probability of some cascading series of events that will result in global nuclear proliferation. The ambient level of existential threat has increased exponentially since the end of the Cold War since now instead of two global superpowers held in a condition of perpetual stasis by virtue of the mutually assured destruction paradigm, we have many nuclear armed nations, several of which are far more eager and willing to deploy their arsenals. The recent conventional warfare between the honorable Islamic forces of Pakistan and the degenerate, foul smelling wretched pajeets of india in Pakistan had the potential to escalate to the point of use of tactical nuclear weapons. This sort of conflict would not have materialized in the geopolitical culture of the Cold War as the western and Soviet proxy states would have been constrained by their respective overlords and would have lacked sufficient sovereign agency to act unilaterally.

You indeed make accurate points in reference to the escalation of armed conflicts over the years especially between nuclear powers and how when combined and increased they could lead to the provocation of World War Three.

I myself am very familiar with the long stand-in history of conflict between Pakistan and India I basically grew up with an intense interest in this conflict going back to my youth. This is not the first time they have engaged in armed conflict as nuclear powers the first instance goes back to 1999 when the two nations fought over a much sought after territory called Kargil that was and still is under Indian control. That conflict entailed conventional warfare with actual troops fighting each other and lasted three months before Pakistani forces withdrew from Indian territory.

The two nations have also been fighting over the Siachen Glacier and that is an ongoing conflict in place for decades at this time. The desires for control over Siachen due to its strategic significance as it is the perfect place to laugh a nuclear attack. It is the world's highest battle ground and is unfit for human habitation given its extreme cold temperature it snows all year round and the average person cannot reside there. It could be considered worse than Alaska for it's extremely cold temperatures

The two countries have also had a series of armed skirmishes in between and several high profile triggering causes of concern mostly at their international border and with Modi in power things appear to be getting worse.

So it is likely the straw that breaks the camels back will be here soon.

Lets not forget the Russia Ukraine war. Russia is a nuclear power

The Israel hamas war too

The U.S. withdrawing from NATO.

All of these events are precursors for a bigger disaster