Page 1 of 1
Radical Patriarchy is the answer
Posted: 15 Dec 2025, 00:40
by NathanLwasright
When we take power we need to strip women of every single right. Marriage should either be decided by the father or by the taking of the female's virginity. Women should be the property of their husbands. They need to clean, cook, and give sex on demand. The husband is ultimate authority. Women must be completely submissive and subservient to their husband. She is beneath him. He is her leader and keeper.
Radical Patriarchy is the answer
Posted: 15 Dec 2025, 00:41
by VH911
i would still let women choose their partner, but their father or brother can decide to deny it.
Radical Patriarchy is the answer
Posted: 15 Dec 2025, 03:26
by Sustacel250
Well it could be the answer if you were able to detach from a feminist understanding of patriarchy.
I mean if you think that feminism is real, you will have a very bad idea of patriarchy, you will think is about brutal male domination where women are oppressed. In a nutshell you would have a fake view of history. Feminism is a movement that has the primary goal of parasitizing the welfare state. So feminists are the most adapted to the welfare, they get more money than blacks and jews combined.
Feminists dedicate their life to this task so they wrote mountains of books and studies about "patriarchy" because this allows them to efficiently acquire collective resources with the mechanisms of welfare.
Now, if you are a normal person in society, the most common prevalent narrative about patriarchy is feminism. The unaware man thinks feminism is "a movement" or "a philosophy" or bunch of girls who complain about objectification. In reality is a political instrument, you can imagine it like a swiss army knife. Many unaware people are completely bamboozled when they notice the extreme inconsistency in the feminist so called "philosophy". It is made that way for a purpose.
The feminist inconsistency and hyper subjectivity I think is related to the task these women have: get resources. And they are getting them. They are the most competent welfare getters, the winners in the welfare competition.
So, what does it has to do with your patriarchy idea? Well if you listen to feminists simply you dont have any idea of what is reality
Radical Patriarchy is the answer
Posted: 15 Dec 2025, 03:31
by NathanLwasright
Sustacel250 wrote: 15 Dec 2025, 03:26
Well it could be the answer if you were able to detach from a feminist understanding of patriarchy.
I mean if you think that feminism is real, you will have a very bad idea of patriarchy, you will think is about brutal male domination where women are oppressed. In a nutshell you would have a fake view of history. Feminism is a movement that has the primary goal of parasitizing the welfare state. So feminists are the most adapted to the welfare, they get more money than blacks and jews combined.
Feminists dedicate their life to this task so they wrote mountains of books and studies about "patriarchy" because this allows them to efficiently acquire collective resources with the mechanisms of welfare.
Now, if you are a normal person in society, the most common prevalent narrative about patriarchy is feminism. The unaware man thinks feminism is "a movement" or "a philosophy" or bunch of girls who complain about objectification. In reality is a political instrument, you can imagine it like a swiss army knife. Many unaware people are completely bamboozled when they notice the extreme inconsistency in the feminist so called "philosophy". It is made that way for a purpose.
The feminist inconsistency and hyper subjectivity I think is related to the task these women have: get resources. And they are getting them. They are the most competent welfare getters, the winners in the welfare competition.
So, what does it has to do with your patriarchy idea? Well if you listen to feminists simply you dont have any idea of what is reality
Male domination and female oppression is the answer. The Muslim countries may have issues, but they don't have a female issue. Women were oppressed in some form or another throughout most of history. Even back in the 50s.