International Brotherhood of Men

I have read unabomber and I found it fun his description of "hypersocialized" types, very funny he also equates them to "leftists".

But the rest of his manifesto was copy pasted by other sources. His manifesto did not contain citations so it fooled the public into thinking he had these ideas on his own, which probably contributed to his great social status. A lot of women (women are dumb) think that unabomer is one of the greatest thinkers humanity ever seen, because his manifesto contains no citations. If it contained citations you would see his ideas are a summary. One thing I can say is the broader genre of civilization critique is less fashionable so women and normies dont feel like reading 800 pages books so they can be fooled into thinking unabomber invented it all. There is also a genre of anti-modern romanticism for example hitler had the book "growth of the soil from knut hamsun". Individualist explorations of psychodrama related to "modernity" is also super common, normies just dont know it, they scratch the surface with unabomber manifesto.

I think unabomber mostly copied from Jacques Ellul (technological society) and Mumfort technics and civilization, or someone else. Honestly I dont know, these critics of modernity all look alike and Im sure they copy each other. There is also a christian field related to modernity, it was in the past also a fashionable topic in arts and cinema. Unabomber is a copy of their works but he did not credited them, of the many works is probably the least authentic and the dumbest. Normies sincerely believe that unabomber is a super genius loner with incredible perceptions far above the norm and all women squirt swimming pools of liquids thinking of being in bed with "the unabomber".

Original thinkers debated evidence, had alternative views and exposed a topic. Some people like Pasolini also admitted maybe modernity is good and it can make someone happy (he admitted it in interviews not in his movies or books).

The manifesto from unabomber instead, converts everything into slogans and "things that are true because I say so". Honestly I cant accept Unabomber stuff, im not a sexually aroused woman, so I think he provides no source and decides his claims are true "because he says so", he romanticizes the past and in all honesty nobody or nothing was prohibiting him to open a rural farm. I dont care about his trauma dumping. I always thought "romantic people" are too self obsessed and think us "normies" or "normal people" dont have our traumas as well. They think we are "lesser people" because we dont like to reach easy conclusions or justify insane asylum level of actions with "because I say so".

I did hear and read women proclaiming the great intelligence of unabomber, they sexually humiliated me comparing me to unabomber, saying im not as "deep" as he is. These women were sexually aroused due to the netflix shows and the great popularity and status of Unabomber, they sincerely believed since their pussy was vibrating and pulsating and gettng red, therefore unabomber is true. Its a sexual humiliation I suffered with many of these "intellectuals" worshiped by normies and women. When normies and women start worshiping one of these dumbasses, they also select sexually someone who has traits they consider close to their favorite intellectual. I dont meet their criteria so they discard me and mock my intelligence.

No woman had attraction to the unabomber. Everything is just roleplay to receive superficial attention.
Also the unabomber did not have ideas that appeal to women.
Women only like extremists who target other men like luigi, women like senseless violence when it entertains them.

VH911 wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 05:10 No woman had attraction to the unabomber. Everything is just roleplay to receive superficial attention.
Also the unabomber did not have ideas that appeal to women.
Women only like extremists who target other men like luigi, women like senseless violence when it entertains them.

I didnt lie. A woman in her 30s was sexually humiliating me, telling I dont understand unabomber. I presume she may have seen him on netflix then reached for the manifesto and she felt deeply accomplished. She humiliated me by comparing my lower standing in society to the image of this guy unabomber. Since my ideas diverge from the ideas of unabomber and since I have less status, I had to be sexually humiliated.

Honestly I dont care about an intellectual usually. For example Jordan Peterson makes it a matter of national pride (hes canadian) to be as boring and pedantic as he can be. No woman squirts fountains listening to Jordan Peterson. Nobody ever compared me to the great status of Peterson because hes boring.

Instead I was sexually humiliated by my woman teachers many times, they were forcing us students to purchase books of intellectuals with greyscale photos. I seen women worshiping intellectuals and then they sexually humiliate men who do not match the same social status. Unabomber is the same thing, a "social type" that is used to compare incels to. Im a lower level person with my low level ideas and opinion, in the eyes of a woman I am not "cool" like unabomber.

Despite my speargun reaches 1000fps and is actually functional unlike the unabomber gun, no woman sees that Im much better than unabomber. This pisses me off. Its the sole reason I hate unabomber. If women were not sexually humiliating me, I wouldnt care about this guy. I only care because I got sexual humiliation and I dont want to live like a bonobo. I want to oppress women so they stop sexually harassing me.

Sustacel250 wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 06:43

VH911 wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 05:10 No woman had attraction to the unabomber. Everything is just roleplay to receive superficial attention.
Also the unabomber did not have ideas that appeal to women.
Women only like extremists who target other men like luigi, women like senseless violence when it entertains them.

I didnt lie. A woman in her 30s was sexually humiliating me, telling I dont understand unabomber. I presume she may have seen him on netflix then reached for the manifesto and she felt deeply accomplished. She humiliated me by comparing my lower standing in society to the image of this guy unabomber. Since my ideas diverge from the ideas of unabomber and since I have less status, I had to be sexually humiliated.

Honestly I dont care about an intellectual usually. For example Jordan Peterson makes it a matter of national pride (hes canadian) to be as boring and pedantic as he can be. No woman squirts fountains listening to Jordan Peterson. Nobody ever compared me to the great status of Peterson because hes boring.

Instead I was sexually humiliated by my woman teachers many times, they were forcing us students to purchase books of intellectuals with greyscale photos. I seen women worshiping intellectuals and then they sexually humiliate men who do not match the same social status. Unabomber is the same thing, a "social type" that is used to compare incels to. Im a lower level person with my low level ideas and opinion, in the eyes of a woman I am not "cool" like unabomber.

Despite my speargun reaches 1000fps and is actually functional unlike the unabomber gun, no woman sees that Im much better than unabomber. This pisses me off. Its the sole reason I hate unabomber. If women were not sexually humiliating me, I wouldnt care about this guy. I only care because I got sexual humiliation and I dont want to live like a bonobo. I want to oppress women so they stop sexually harassing me.

Shw only liked him because of netflix. She probably doesn't understand that going back to the roots means no feminism for her.

VH911 wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 08:40 Shw only liked him because of netflix. She probably doesn't understand that going back to the roots means no feminism for her.

Depends. A lot of primitivist romantic people argue going back to nature will make women very happy and there will be an egalitarian commune of some sort. I honestly dont like romantic people because they trauma dump on us "normies" their deranged delusions. I dont give a fuck and if they want to go live in a shit hippy commune and drink polluted water I dont really care.

Overall was just here to point out one important thing: If woman has a pussy super red and shes ready to be impregnated and shes giving signals of sexual arousal, this is not an argument. Vagina tingles isnt an argument. If women want me to bow down to Unabomber because their pussy is super excited, they dont have an argument. I want to hear an argument, I dont want to hear a woman who is sexually aroused by some serial killer. This is my point in a nutshell: vagina isnt an argument

Women have always loved the dangerous or "bad" boy. It's in their wiring; men capable of killing other men will guarantee more resources for them. Male lions will kill cubs, and then mate with the mothers minutes after.

That's why serial killers and school shooters always get girlfriends and wives while in prison. Ironically (I suppose it's ironic) if Elliot Rodger didn't kill himself, and instead got a life sentence, he would have been swimming in pussy. He could have even gotten married, had conjugal visits, and been a father by now.

Women owe every man, who has obeyed the law, but still isn't getting laid, an apology. Women should also condemn this type of behavior, but it'll never happen.

IBG wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 10:16 Women owe every man, who has obeyed the law, but still isn't getting laid, an apology. Women should also condemn this type of behavior, but it'll never happen.

Curious things theres legit chads who got less attention from women than these serial killers. Or, imagine a healthy normal man, physically capable but not extremely good looking. An avg man has a killing potential much greater than any of these serial killers.

In wars like these ones we are seeing, there are some legit war heroes who killed 100+ people, but they are totally average looking dudes. In ukraine or russia, there are some who were rising to the challenge and some did a ton of killshots. Most of these men were avg in looks avg in everything, not even physically fit.

But for some reason women salivate over the psycho clown dumbass who isnt even that good, and shoots himself on the foot while doing some cringe emotional video.

These fucking bitches should be ridiculed on a daily basis.

IBG wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 10:16 Women have always loved the dangerous or "bad" boy. It's in their wiring; men capable of killing other men will guarantee more resources for them. Male lions will kill cubs, and then mate with the mothers minutes after.

That's why serial killers and school shooters always get girlfriends and wives while in prison. Ironically (I suppose it's ironic) if Elliot Rodger didn't kill himself, and instead got a life sentence, he would have been swimming in pussy. He could have even gotten married, had conjugal visits, and been a father by now.

Women owe every man, who has obeyed the law, but still isn't getting laid, an apology. Women should also condemn this type of behavior, but it'll never happen.

Just not true.
And if a male lion kills someone else's child, it has nothing to do with violent men.

Sustacel250 wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 09:59

VH911 wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 08:40 Shw only liked him because of netflix. She probably doesn't understand that going back to the roots means no feminism for her.

Depends. A lot of primitivist romantic people argue going back to nature will make women very happy and there will be an egalitarian commune of some sort. I honestly dont like romantic people because they trauma dump on us "normies" their deranged delusions. I dont give a fuck and if they want to go live in a shit hippy commune and drink polluted water I dont really care.

Overall was just here to point out one important thing: If woman has a pussy super red and shes ready to be impregnated and shes giving signals of sexual arousal, this is not an argument. Vagina tingles isnt an argument. If women want me to bow down to Unabomber because their pussy is super excited, they dont have an argument. I want to hear an argument, I dont want to hear a woman who is sexually aroused by some serial killer. This is my point in a nutshell: vagina isnt an argument

Nope, none of these women believe this. And we wouldnt be in some egalitarian commune