Predetermined conclusions

[Sustacel250]

The facts are women like greatly only a small subset of male population we refer to as "chads". The blackpill conclusion is "therefore I will be sad about it becuase life is unfair". My own conclusion is "therefore I will stop chasing women because I know the outcome, I will refuse the dating ideology and not use any of their algorithmic apps". This premise is also false and poorly formulated but im showing you how someone can come to a different conclusion.

A blackpill perspective brings people to make dating profiles and bend down to women and compete in a market where women have disproportionate power. A person like myself instead observes the facts once and concludes I have to modify my life to exploit other alternatives. I dont have to bow down to "blackpill prophets", I can acknowledge women exist, and do something about it anyway. I dont have to be depressed like "blackpill prophets" want me to be. I dont even have to be "blackpilled". I can observe there is a stone, maybe a blackpiller will cry unfairness because a stone exists. But I can do something differnt, different choices.

For example, in my incel days this was the top science we had at our disposal: https://sirtyrionlannister.wordpress.com/

The author of the blog concluded "therefore we have to create a fascist dystopia to force women to mate with low value men". I concluded "therefore I want to bio-engineer stacies and study MK ultra programming". I didnt conclude the same thing he did. But we considered the same data.

What I dislike about blackpill is it often forces people to do predetermined conclusions. Its like when I was doing catechism at the church, they were training me on call and response. For example the priest tells me what is the question, what is the answer.

Example: who made you? My answer would be "god made me". Obviously they will first give me the question, but its a question I may have developed differently if I was not subjected to catholic indoctrination. Instead of wording it like "made" I would have recursively looked into the evolutionary situation and posed a different question entirely, and that would have brought me to come up with another conclusion.

Then they give me another question-answer: Who is god? My answer will be God is the all powerful all knowing loving creator of heaven and earth. This is basically delphi method, they give you false questions and false answers. Any response that deviates still has to answer "what is god". So even if I disagree with that predetermined answer I still have to affirm god anyway. This is a very simple mind trick.

How many persons are there in god? Well in my case predetermined answer was "there are 3: father, son and holy spirit". This question already assumes god manifested in multiple forms. If I had a different answer, I would have still had to admit the premise is to associate god with multiple identities.

You see the trick? We are getting trained like dogs to call and respond to stimuli our "blackpill prophets" have control over. What infuriates me is that these "blackpill prophets" have no authority, and they are way lower in sophistication than catholic church. If I wanted, I could be a theologian now. If I wanted to be brain damaged I would have done it already, I have much greater mental faculties than these "blackpill prophets" and If I wanted I could have been a managerial level priest. So it pissess me off I freed myself from the shackles of the church indoctrination only to fall victim of way lower way more shameful indoctrination tactics by "blackpill prophets".