International Brotherhood of Men

if someone in the IPF, ILM ascends what is the policy?

once our movement becomes tens of thousands strong the leadership should be statusmaxxed enough to secure a foid

On the contrary, the leadership ought to remain entirely incel. As those in the highest positions of authority must have purity of purpose and complete ideological commitment to the cause of incel liberation, lest our organization will fall prey to conflicts of interest, squabbles ober sexhaving, and the kinds of ego games we have witnessed of the incels.is mods. Our organization represents incels first and foremost, and our leadership ought to embody that representation.

Sexhavers may remain supporters and allies in the International Brotherhood of Men but will not be permitted into the elite IPF nor the highest echelons of leadership

wonder if anyone sucessfuly ascended here

Ashlord wrote: 12 Jul 2024, 00:31 if someone in the IPF, ILM ascends what is the policy?

once our movement becomes tens of thousands strong the leadership should be statusmaxxed enough to secure a foid

While I understand the nature of your inquiry as well as the legitimacy of the concern, it seems to me that the matter ought to be manifestly self evident to anyone who spends any more then a few seconds ruminating on it. I have spoken and written extensively on this very topic and have recently had to enforce disciplinary action against a former comrade of ours who abandoned his brothers in arms as soon as he attained a mere scrap of overly used and thoroughly dilapidated, rancid cunny.

Our policy is and will always be to insist that incel men never repudiate their allegiance to our liberation struggle and our righteous efforts to vindicate the innumerable wrongs that have been unjustly inflicted upon us by society writ large and especially jews and women. To think that once you ascend the problems of incel men suddenly become irrelevant is to assume a hopelessly solipsistic, selfish and egotistical attitude which denigrates your former commitment to our honorable ideals.

I have analogized this paradigm to a fanatical member of the early Communist party who is zealously committed to fighting on behalf his fellow proletariat and destroying the oppression of the aristocracy but who happens to win the Russian lottery and therefore becomes extravagantly wealthy. Should this man betray his former allegiances and disregard the noble cause of revolution merely because he happened to have had great fortune bestowed upon him or should he recognize that the problems, sufferings and tortures of his fellow men are exactly what they had been before he became wealthy and thus he should invest his time, energy and new found wealth in furtherance of consummating his revolutionary ideals. Same applies to those who ascend.

my personal policy is that I dont give a flyng fuck and I dont care.

What I care about is if you have ideas or not, and if you want to do something about feminism or not.

So for example inside MGTOW we had some married men administering communities. Is it a contradiction? should we prioritize the MGTOW identity over the idea of being united against feminism? In my case, I decided I really dont care about how you self identify. And I extend this also towards ideologies or religions. So I dont care if youre a nazi, communist or whatever you self identify with. Most of these labels are also false by the way.

As for inceldom. We had already many discussions about it. We discussed who we are, what is an incel. The question "what is an incel" is a long debate in incel scene. I offered already my take on it. TLDR: I think incel is whoever defines himself as incel. If yuo have the guts to say "I am incel" in front of a normie, this is what you are because you demonstrated your courage. I take it as a proof that you have what it takes to face adversaries, its an undeniable proof of your resolve.

So if we had a self defined incel who in real life looks like david gandy, I wouldnt bat an eye nor care about him. So long he has ideas Im good.

On the contrary, if someone is ugly as fuck but he has no ideas and he just wants to take comfort in knowing hes surrounded by people "just like him" then I dont respect him much. I think we should define ourselves not for similarity of physical features, its way more important if you have ideas or not.

Also, its not that if you "ascend" then the material realities described by the blackpill dissipate into the nothing. You present the idea that "ascension" as defined by lookism somehow erases material reality. If we described the feminism tribunals or the peril of the redpill false war of ideas, none of this dissipates once you "ascend" (according to the lookism perspective). Nothing changes, you just got a blowjob, really this changes nothing at all.

If you change your mind after a woman touches your pee-pee, I consider you trash that failed in life and had no ideas. This is my take.