Conservative redefining traditional virtues.

Talk about anything unrelated to men's rights
Post Reply
Sustacel250
Reactions:
Posts: 1219
Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Basically the traditional notion of responsibility is: Active relationship of power, owning your choices. Emphasis on "owning" you have to be sort of high status and honorable to have ownership. Or, care for what is entrusted to you, being accountable for actions isnt bad, it stems from ownership. Basically, in a nutshell is a form of agency and honor.

Ownership means you are author of your actions. It signals more than anything your higher status in life.

Now, responsibility according to a conservative viewpoint is this: Submission to "hadship" (we have to open a separated topic to describe this one too, they redefined many many things), or obedience without complaint. Emphasis on "complaint". In the contemporary conservative discussion complaint is a sin and many behaviors are reinterpreted by these snake liars as "complaint" without being suited for the slanderous definition.

They go on, they mean it as "doing as youre told" accepting burdens that are not yours, not seeking changes when a honorable man truly should seek change of a system in such circumstances.

This is one example of conserivative people redefininig virtues or traditions.

Overall my point is that on the internet we are accustomed to this idea that SJWs and "progressives" have redefined most of the jargon we use, we think of the word "antisemitism" or "misogyny" or "racism" as prime examples. Even the word "israelite" is one of them. There are many words that lost meaning, even "liberalism" did.

So my aim here is to show you that conservative people arent a joke either, they redefined pretty much all the classical virtues, masculinity included. You gotta be wary, alerted, and know the truth of the classical antiquity. We live in the boomer-yuga the age of lies.

This is a discussion that had more value inside MGTOW circles, they were often used to notice that you cannot be responsible for woman behavior if your society does not implies ownership of women. They often clumsily said "if women are not property, then this responsibility implies slavery for us", and they are right at the core. Its just the conservatives redefined "responsibility" and betrayed tradition.
User avatar
VH911
Soldier
Soldier
Reactions:
Posts: 1245
Joined: 23 May 2024, 20:34

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

You're talking about tradcucks
Sustacel250
Reactions:
Posts: 1219
Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

VH911 wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 05:51 You're talking about tradcucks
No I really refer to the conservative social type. Its mainstream parlance and these new modern meanings effectively are in use.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in