Page 1 of 3
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
				by General Alek
				Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 09:54
				by HA696
				There is no such thing as morality. Satan is the god of the cosmos. Everything is defeated. Hail the 7 princes of hell and the qliphoth!
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 11:20
				by Massimo
				General Alek wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
 
According to normies anyone under 25 is a child.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 18:29
				by KingDavid
				Massimo wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 11:20
General Alek wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
 
According to normies anyone under 25 is a child.
 
Normies will say you’re a pedophile if you’re 30 and date a 19 year old woman. I’m like wtf 18 years and older is legal pussy? I don’t understand.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 18:30
				by KingDavid
				HA696 wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:54
There is no such thing as morality. Satan is the god of the cosmos. Everything is defeated. Hail the 7 princes of hell and the qliphoth!
 
Fucking retarded bro. Yes the Bible does say Satan is the god of this world but he’s not the real God. You’re gonna die and wake up burning in hell if you follow that satanic bullshit. Repent and turn to Jesus Christ.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 18:34
				by KingDavid
				General Alek wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
 
I don’t agree with Hillary Clinton and raping 5 year olds, but fucking a high school age bitch honestly isn’t that morally bad. It’s legal in a bunch of countries to fuck 14 year olds and 16 year olds. And some of them are fully developed and look identical to 18+ year olds. A lot of normies act like they hate pedophiles who would fuck a 14-17 year old bitch, but honestly I think they’re just penis worshippers who hate people having sex in general. They wish everyone was cloned in a lab and a transsexual like their god Lucifer.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 08:19
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
 
Pedophilia is wrong because puberty is the biological marker of eligibility for sex. Your dick is not designed to penetrate pre-pubescent girls just like how your mouth is not designed to eat shit. Still, I don't think (male on female) pedophilia is the worst sin one can commit. I would respect a straight male pedo more than I would respect a faggot for example. That being said, sexual perversions usually tend to be comorbid. Meaning that if a person is sexually perverted in one way (pedophile), they are more likely to be perverted in other ways (Homosexual, transvestite, etc.) as well. Best way to deal with these kinds of abominations is just executing them before they find a chance to spread their degeneracy.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 08:56
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:19
General Alek wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
 
Pedophilia is wrong because puberty is the biological marker of eligibility for sex. Your dick is not designed to penetrate pre-pubescent girls just like how your mouth is not designed to eat shit. Still, I don't think (male on female) pedophilia is the worst sin one can commit. I would respect a straight male pedo more than I would respect a faggot for example. That being said, sexual perversions usually tend to be comorbid. Meaning that if a person is sexually perverted in one way (pedophile), they are more likely to be perverted in other ways (Homosexual, transvestite, etc.) as well. Best way to deal with these kinds of abominations is just executing them before they find a chance to spread their degeneracy.
 
Women who let boys fuck them are based
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:56
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:19
General Alek wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:41
Adults are similar to children
So ive never understood why people act like having sex with children is so massively evil, but that having sex with adults is not evil at all
Adults are similar to children, so isn't it similarly evil?
Couldn't it cause a similar amount of psychological damage and trauma etc. ?
I mean, not quite as much as it would cause to a child, but at least something?
Guys who are "successful" with women don't seem so different to guys who are "successful" with kids
Both are creepy predators who can take advantage of someone, even if they say they consent 
The minds of women aren't that different to the minds of kids, so chad could be considered a bit of a nonce
 
Pedophilia is wrong because puberty is the biological marker of eligibility for sex. Your dick is not designed to penetrate pre-pubescent girls just like how your mouth is not designed to eat shit. Still, I don't think (male on female) pedophilia is the worst sin one can commit. I would respect a straight male pedo more than I would respect a faggot for example. That being said, sexual perversions usually tend to be comorbid. Meaning that if a person is sexually perverted in one way (pedophile), they are more likely to be perverted in other ways (Homosexual, transvestite, etc.) as well. Best way to deal with these kinds of abominations is just executing them before they find a chance to spread their degeneracy.
 
Women who let boys fuck them are based
 
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 09:47
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:56
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:19
Pedophilia is wrong because puberty is the biological marker of eligibility for sex. Your dick is not designed to penetrate pre-pubescent girls just like how your mouth is not designed to eat shit. Still, I don't think (male on female) pedophilia is the worst sin one can commit. I would respect a straight male pedo more than I would respect a faggot for example. That being said, sexual perversions usually tend to be comorbid. Meaning that if a person is sexually perverted in one way (pedophile), they are more likely to be perverted in other ways (Homosexual, transvestite, etc.) as well. Best way to deal with these kinds of abominations is just executing them before they find a chance to spread their degeneracy.
 
Women who let boys fuck them are based
 
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
How could she let him fuck her if he couldn't get an erection?
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 09:48
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:56
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:19
Pedophilia is wrong because puberty is the biological marker of eligibility for sex. Your dick is not designed to penetrate pre-pubescent girls just like how your mouth is not designed to eat shit. Still, I don't think (male on female) pedophilia is the worst sin one can commit. I would respect a straight male pedo more than I would respect a faggot for example. That being said, sexual perversions usually tend to be comorbid. Meaning that if a person is sexually perverted in one way (pedophile), they are more likely to be perverted in other ways (Homosexual, transvestite, etc.) as well. Best way to deal with these kinds of abominations is just executing them before they find a chance to spread their degeneracy.
 
Women who let boys fuck them are based
 
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
Mentally scar the boy?
LOL, absolutely pathetic
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 09:57
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:47
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:56
Women who let boys fuck them are based
 
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
How could she let him fuck her if he couldn't get an erection?
 
That's what I was asking. You should've said teenagers to avoid confusion. I thought you meant kids based on context.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 09:59
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:48
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 08:56
Women who let boys fuck them are based
 
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
Mentally scar the boy?
LOL, absolutely pathetic
 
A teenager wouldn't be affected by it obviously. But a kid can develop mental pathologies after such an encounter. What's funny about it?
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:02
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:57
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:47
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
How could she let him fuck her if he couldn't get an erection?
 
That's what I was asking. You should've said teenagers to avoid confusion. I thought you meant kids based on context.
 
A 12 year old can get an erection
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:03
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:59
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:48
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:28
If by boys you mean pre-pubescent males then there's nothing based about it and you have to be retarded to think otherwise. Boys can't get erections or produce sperm so they can't perform or enjoy any kind of sex. A sexual encounter between a grown woman and a boy would only benefit the woman and mentally scar the boy.
 
Mentally scar the boy?
LOL, absolutely pathetic
 
A teenager wouldn't be affected by it obviously. But a kid can develop mental pathologies after such an encounter. What's funny about it?
 
Depends what you mean by a "kid"
A 12 year old?
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:05
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:03
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:59
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:48
Mentally scar the boy?
LOL, absolutely pathetic
 
A teenager wouldn't be affected by it obviously. But a kid can develop mental pathologies after such an encounter. What's funny about it?
 
Depends what you mean by a "kid"
A 12 year old?
 
A kid is a pre-pubescent so more like 7-8.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:06
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:02
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:57
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:47
How could she let him fuck her if he couldn't get an erection?
 
That's what I was asking. You should've said teenagers to avoid confusion. I thought you meant kids based on context.
 
A 12 year old can get an erection
 
That's a teenager.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:08
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:06
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:02
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 09:57
That's what I was asking. You should've said teenagers to avoid confusion. I thought you meant kids based on context.
 
A 12 year old can get an erection
 
That's a teenager.
 
A 12 year old is a teenager?
Now who's retarded?
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:25
				by Supreme Misogynist
				General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:08
A 12 year old is a teenager?
 
Yes? It changes from person to person of course but It's natural for males to hit puberty, which marks the end of childhood, when they're 12.
This is not the gotcha you think it is.
 
			 
			
					
				Non-virgins are comparable to paedophiles
				Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 10:33
				by General Alek
				Supreme Misogynist wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:25
General Alek wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 10:08
A 12 year old is a teenager?
 
Yes? It changes from person to person of course but It's natural for males to hit puberty, which marks the end of childhood, when they're 12.
This is not the gotcha you think it is.
 
A 12 year old is pubescent
But is not a teenager by literal definition