Normies are terrified of phone cameras in public

[Massimo]

[Massimo]

There's nothing illegal about taking photos in public unless it's inside of a or on a business.

[VH911]

There's nothing illegal about taking photos in public unless it's inside of a or on a business.

It's wrong tho if you're targeting specific people.

[Massimo]

There's nothing illegal about taking photos in public unless it's inside of a or on a business.

It's wrong tho if you're targeting specific people.

If I find a woman with nice big tits wall by me or on the bus I'm taking a picture and what do you mean specific people most people in public are random unspisfic people.

[Sustacel250]

Personally i have some antisocial perspectives i told to privacy movement a couple of times.

I told them they waste their efforts and time, because the reality of gossiping shaming and bullshitting behind people backs is mostly due to women perpetrators. Elites in the past did never need to have tech state surveillance and in many ways their control of society was much stronger than what they have now with palantir and other copes for old people sold at world economic forum.

One must be stupid to think tech surveillance enables stronger elite power, I listened to world economic forum lectures and youtube materials for a while. And all I seen were anxious, rich, old people scared. All scared and they bought whatever was sold to to them associated with the idea of "controlling masses".

In my incel perspective, more tech surveilance means I can prove I didnt do anything wrong (I can expand on this point a lot). I know during 2013 in my country the tribunals established we can use any conversation including whatsapp to demonstrate things, so I thought "good for me" so women will have a harder time using their predatory tactics against me. I know women are social superpredators and having AI surveilance everywhere is wholesome for me. Because I never did anything wrong.

I know the saying "if you didnt do anythign wrong then dont worry" is a lie and has been debonked many times by privacy community. However this is entirely my perspective, I really do nothing wrong and so being able to prove my innocence makes me stronger. I think, in any case, that you have to be stupid to not see the reality of fods being social superpredators. And you gotta be beyond retarded to think elites of te past needed tech surveilance to control people, the social control operated by foid temple prostitutes is way beyond what tech does.

[VH911]

There's nothing illegal about taking photos in public unless it's inside of a or on a business.

It's wrong tho if you're targeting specific people.

If I find a woman with nice big tits wall by me or on the bus I'm taking a picture and what do you mean specific people most people in public are random unspisfic people.

Read again, i mean taegeting specific people.
And btw women aren't people.

[VH911]

Personally i have some antisocial perspectives i told to privacy movement a couple of times.

I told them they waste their efforts and time, because the reality of gossiping shaming and bullshitting behind people backs is mostly due to women perpetrators. Elites in the past did never need to have tech state surveillance and in many ways their control of society was much stronger than what they have now with palantir and other copes for old people sold at world economic forum.

One must be stupid to think tech surveillance enables stronger elite power, I listened to world economic forum lectures and youtube materials for a while. And all I seen were anxious, rich, old people scared. All scared and they bought whatever was sold to to them associated with the idea of "controlling masses".

In my incel perspective, more tech surveilance means I can prove I didnt do anything wrong (I can expand on this point a lot). I know during 2013 in my country the tribunals established we can use any conversation including whatsapp to demonstrate things, so I thought "good for me" so women will have a harder time using their predatory tactics against me. I know women are social superpredators and having AI surveilance everywhere is wholesome for me. Because I never did anything wrong.

I know the saying "if you didnt do anythign wrong then dont worry" is a lie and has been debonked many times by privacy community. However this is entirely my perspective, I really do nothing wrong and so being able to prove my innocence makes me stronger. I think, in any case, that you have to be stupid to not see the reality of fods being social superpredators. And you gotta be beyond retarded to think elites of te past needed tech surveilance to control people, the social control operated by foid temple prostitutes is way beyond what tech does.

Short sighted.
More surveilance means less responsibility for the individual which means it will affect men who will get oppressed because they cant defend themselves anymore. It has similar effects like sovial welfare which only benefits women.

[Sustacel250]

Short sighted.
More surveilance means less responsibility for the individual which means it will affect men who will get oppressed because they cant defend themselves anymore. It has similar effects like sovial welfare which only benefits women.

understandable and I think the privacy movement has a ton merit and theyre right in their own way. I just see it this way. Dont care if you disagree I compared my reasons to others and seems for me is OK to be under surveillance. Foids preoccupy more, and I have to strike a balance in my life. If I worry about being watched too much, I will be slave of my own paranoia. Slavery for slavery I pick the one I find better.

[Massimo]

Personally i have some antisocial perspectives i told to privacy movement a couple of times.

I told them they waste their efforts and time, because the reality of gossiping shaming and bullshitting behind people backs is mostly due to women perpetrators. Elites in the past did never need to have tech state surveillance and in many ways their control of society was much stronger than what they have now with palantir and other copes for old people sold at world economic forum.

One must be stupid to think tech surveillance enables stronger elite power, I listened to world economic forum lectures and youtube materials for a while. And all I seen were anxious, rich, old people scared. All scared and they bought whatever was sold to to them associated with the idea of "controlling masses".

In my incel perspective, more tech surveilance means I can prove I didnt do anything wrong (I can expand on this point a lot). I know during 2013 in my country the tribunals established we can use any conversation including whatsapp to demonstrate things, so I thought "good for me" so women will have a harder time using their predatory tactics against me. I know women are social superpredators and having AI surveilance everywhere is wholesome for me. Because I never did anything wrong.

I know the saying "if you didnt do anythign wrong then dont worry" is a lie and has been debonked many times by privacy community. However this is entirely my perspective, I really do nothing wrong and so being able to prove my innocence makes me stronger. I think, in any case, that you have to be stupid to not see the reality of fods being social superpredators. And you gotta be beyond retarded to think elites of te past needed tech surveilance to control people, the social control operated by foid temple prostitutes is way beyond what tech does.

Short sighted.
More surveilance means less responsibility for the individual which means it will affect men who will get oppressed because they cant defend themselves anymore. It has similar effects like sovial welfare which only benefits women.

Backwards more surveillance means more accountability.

[Massimo]

Short sighted.
More surveilance means less responsibility for the individual which means it will affect men who will get oppressed because they cant defend themselves anymore. It has similar effects like sovial welfare which only benefits women.

understandable and I think the privacy movement has a ton merit and theyre right in their own way. I just see it this way. Dont care if you disagree I compared my reasons to others and seems for me is OK to be under surveillance. Foids preoccupy more, and I have to strike a balance in my life. If I worry about being watched too much, I will be slave of my own paranoia. Slavery for slavery I pick the one I find better.

No point in be worried about being watched by cameras because everytime you are outside in public a camera has taken a photo and Video of you.

[VH911]

Personally i have some antisocial perspectives i told to privacy movement a couple of times.

I told them they waste their efforts and time, because the reality of gossiping shaming and bullshitting behind people backs is mostly due to women perpetrators. Elites in the past did never need to have tech state surveillance and in many ways their control of society was much stronger than what they have now with palantir and other copes for old people sold at world economic forum.

One must be stupid to think tech surveillance enables stronger elite power, I listened to world economic forum lectures and youtube materials for a while. And all I seen were anxious, rich, old people scared. All scared and they bought whatever was sold to to them associated with the idea of "controlling masses".

In my incel perspective, more tech surveilance means I can prove I didnt do anything wrong (I can expand on this point a lot). I know during 2013 in my country the tribunals established we can use any conversation including whatsapp to demonstrate things, so I thought "good for me" so women will have a harder time using their predatory tactics against me. I know women are social superpredators and having AI surveilance everywhere is wholesome for me. Because I never did anything wrong.

I know the saying "if you didnt do anythign wrong then dont worry" is a lie and has been debonked many times by privacy community. However this is entirely my perspective, I really do nothing wrong and so being able to prove my innocence makes me stronger. I think, in any case, that you have to be stupid to not see the reality of fods being social superpredators. And you gotta be beyond retarded to think elites of te past needed tech surveilance to control people, the social control operated by foid temple prostitutes is way beyond what tech does.

Short sighted.
More surveilance means less responsibility for the individual which means it will affect men who will get oppressed because they cant defend themselves anymore. It has similar effects like sovial welfare which only benefits women.

Backwards more surveillance means more accountability.

no, i already explained you why.