Page 1 of 1
Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:18 pm
by General Alek
or does it just overcomplicate things?
is it taking attention away from the IBM and IPF?
would it be more efficient to cut out the middleman, and just have the IBM and the IPF, so that these 2 vital organisations could get more dense focus?
it seems like there are so many forums here, that people are spoilt for choice
maybe the forums would get more views if they were simpler and had less sections, and the sections we did have were bigger, with long rows of threads like on .is
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:50 pm
by Darth_aurelius
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:18 pm
or does it just overcomplicate things?
is it taking attention away from the IBM and IPF?
would it be more efficient to cut out the middleman, and just have the IBM and the IPF, so that these 2 vital organisations could get more dense focus?
it seems like there are so many forums here, that people are spoilt for choice
maybe the forums would get more views if they were simpler and had less sections, and the sections we did have were bigger, with long rows of threads like on .is
I was literally just thinking about this earlier this afternoon as I was posting in each of the dedicated announcements sections of each of our constituent forums and though that it was a bit redundant to have to post the same document thrice. I will bring this up in our next staff briefing and solicit the feedback of the bright, IQmaxxed minds which comprise our headquarters unit.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:11 pm
by General Alek
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:50 pm
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:18 pm
or does it just overcomplicate things?
is it taking attention away from the IBM and IPF?
would it be more efficient to cut out the middleman, and just have the IBM and the IPF, so that these 2 vital organisations could get more dense focus?
it seems like there are so many forums here, that people are spoilt for choice
maybe the forums would get more views if they were simpler and had less sections, and the sections we did have were bigger, with long rows of threads like on .is
I was literally just thinking about this earlier this afternoon as I was posting in each of the dedicated announcements sections of each of our constituent forums and though that it was a bit redundant to have to post the same document thrice. I will bring this up in our next staff briefing and solicit the feedback of the bright, IQmaxxed minds which comprise our headquarters unit.
wow
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:13 pm
by Darth_aurelius
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:11 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:50 pm
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:18 pm
or does it just overcomplicate things?
is it taking attention away from the IBM and IPF?
would it be more efficient to cut out the middleman, and just have the IBM and the IPF, so that these 2 vital organisations could get more dense focus?
it seems like there are so many forums here, that people are spoilt for choice
maybe the forums would get more views if they were simpler and had less sections, and the sections we did have were bigger, with long rows of threads like on .is
I was literally just thinking about this earlier this afternoon as I was posting in each of the dedicated announcements sections of each of our constituent forums and though that it was a bit redundant to have to post the same document thrice. I will bring this up in our next staff briefing and solicit the feedback of the bright, IQmaxxed minds which comprise our headquarters unit.
wow
Also, I have instructed my technical services staff to implement a forum awards protocol which will recognize the achievements of dedicated comrades like you and I so that we can now not only postmaxx but also forum awardmaxx.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:41 pm
by General Alek
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:13 pm
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:11 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:50 pm
I was literally just thinking about this earlier this afternoon as I was posting in each of the dedicated announcements sections of each of our constituent forums and though that it was a bit redundant to have to post the same document thrice. I will bring this up in our next staff briefing and solicit the feedback of the bright, IQmaxxed minds which comprise our headquarters unit.
wow
Also, I have instructed my technical services staff to implement a forum awards protocol which will recognize the achievements of dedicated comrades like you and I so that we can now not only postmaxx but also forum awardmaxx.
sweet
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:54 pm
by TheRapist
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:13 pm
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:11 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:50 pm
I was literally just thinking about this earlier this afternoon as I was posting in each of the dedicated announcements sections of each of our constituent forums and though that it was a bit redundant to have to post the same document thrice. I will bring this up in our next staff briefing and solicit the feedback of the bright, IQmaxxed minds which comprise our headquarters unit.
wow
Also, I have instructed my technical services staff to implement a forum awards protocol which will recognize the achievements of dedicated comrades like you and I so that we can now not only postmaxx but also forum awardmaxx.
Lol that's based and it will mog the .is cretins.
Also try to implement like a RPG leveling up system and forum currency that you can gain via contributing (or it can be like in based space where you get levels from reactions) and to bolster engagement perhaps a profile customization or colors unlocked with in forum currency and exp points, like with a videogame ; as I suggested previously.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:55 pm
by Darth_aurelius
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:41 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:13 pm
Also, I have instructed my technical services staff to implement a forum awards protocol which will recognize the achievements of dedicated comrades like you and I so that we can now not only postmaxx but also forum awardmaxx.
sweet
And standby for an important job posting that I will be personally placing in the announcements section of the IBM forums. I think you will want to take a look at it as I feel as though you might well be qualified for our new vacancy.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:18 pm
by General Alek
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:55 pm
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:41 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:13 pm
Also, I have instructed my technical services staff to implement a forum awards protocol which will recognize the achievements of dedicated comrades like you and I so that we can now not only postmaxx but also forum awardmaxx.
sweet
And standby for an important job posting that I will be personally placing in the announcements section of the IBM forums. I think you will want to take a look at it as I feel as though you might well be qualified for our new vacancy.
I hope I'm up to it
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:20 pm
by PoodankMcGee
Hm, yes it certainly is something to reconsider. It makes sense as a kind of middle ground between the other two groups. The IPF is meant to be our most elite and committed members who wish to partake in serious activism on behalf of inceldom, whereas the IBM is meant to be our broadest support base, including non-incels and other elements from the broader manosphere who may be sympathetic allies interested in forming a broader coalition with us to oppose foids and simps—as ultimately any serious, successful political movement is going to require a coalition beyond just incels.
The ILM is therefore intended to be a middle ground for our incel brethren who may not be fully committed to the IPF but would like to discuss incel-specific issues in an incel-exclusive place.
I do agree though it leads to bloating somewhat on our homepage for those who have full IPF access—something we must continually evaluate going forward.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:20 pm
by Darth_aurelius
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:18 pm
Darth_aurelius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:55 pm
And standby for an important job posting that I will be personally placing in the announcements section of the IBM forums. I think you will want to take a look at it as I feel as though you might well be qualified for our new vacancy.
I hope I'm up to it
Go and take a look right now as I just posted it. Please let us know if you are interested as we need to fill this vacancy as soon as is feasible.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:53 pm
by Darth_aurelius
PoodankMcGee wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:20 pm
Hm, yes it certainly is something to reconsider. It makes sense as a kind of middle ground between the other two groups. The IPF is meant to be our most elite and committed members who wish to partake in serious activism on behalf of inceldom, whereas the IBM is meant to be our broadest support base, including non-incels and other elements from the broader manosphere who may be sympathetic allies interested in forming a broader coalition with us to oppose foids and simps—as ultimately any serious, successful political movement is going to require a coalition beyond just incels.
The ILM is therefore intended to be a middle ground for our incel brethren who may not be fully committed to the IPF but would like to discuss incel-specific issues in an incel-exclusive place.
I do agree though it leads to bloating somewhat on our homepage for those who have full IPF access—something we must continually evaluate going forward.
Excellent points as always, Sergeant Major. I do actually agree now after reflecting on what you just said above that it may be better to retain the old tripartite echeloned system so that we do have an intermediate layer between the elite class and the common supporters who may lack the resolve that we expect of our IPF comrades. I think the principle was originally envisioned as being instrumental in our vetting process so that the more layers we had, the more selective we could be and the less likely any undeserving candidate would ever aspire to IPF soldier status or, Allah forbid, be inducted in to the HQ staff. We will have to discuss this on Friday and please bring it up if I forget.
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 10:18 pm
by General Alek
PoodankMcGee wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:20 pm
Hm, yes it certainly is something to reconsider. It makes sense as a kind of middle ground between the other two groups. The IPF is meant to be our most elite and committed members who wish to partake in serious activism on behalf of inceldom, whereas the IBM is meant to be our broadest support base, including non-incels and other elements from the broader manosphere who may be sympathetic allies interested in forming a broader coalition with us to oppose foids and simps—as ultimately any serious, successful political movement is going to require a coalition beyond just incels.
The ILM is therefore intended to be a middle ground for our incel brethren who may not be fully committed to the IPF but would like to discuss incel-specific issues in an incel-exclusive place.
I do agree though it leads to bloating somewhat on our homepage for those who have full IPF access—something we must continually evaluate going forward.
But Sgt. McGee, we don't yet have the numbers to be so selective
The IBM alone should be enough to accommodate those less serious about the movement
and promotion to the IPF would be a much juicier incentive for them to serve us than promotion to the ILM
more soldiers would be great, and even the real army only has 1 recruit stage before you become a soldier
Re: Is the ILM really necessary?
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2024 10:20 pm
by Darth_aurelius
General Alek wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 10:18 pm
PoodankMcGee wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:20 pm
Hm, yes it certainly is something to reconsider. It makes sense as a kind of middle ground between the other two groups. The IPF is meant to be our most elite and committed members who wish to partake in serious activism on behalf of inceldom, whereas the IBM is meant to be our broadest support base, including non-incels and other elements from the broader manosphere who may be sympathetic allies interested in forming a broader coalition with us to oppose foids and simps—as ultimately any serious, successful political movement is going to require a coalition beyond just incels.
The ILM is therefore intended to be a middle ground for our incel brethren who may not be fully committed to the IPF but would like to discuss incel-specific issues in an incel-exclusive place.
I do agree though it leads to bloating somewhat on our homepage for those who have full IPF access—something we must continually evaluate going forward.
But Sgt. McGee, we don't yet have the numbers to be so selective
The IBM alone should be enough to accommodate those less serious about the movement
and promotion to the IPF would be a much juicier incentive for them to serve us than promotion to the ILM
more soldiers would be great, and even the real army only has 1 recruit stage before you become a soldier
Good points comrade. You always have a very circumspect way of looking at the relevant factual considerations which is yet one more reason why I think you ought to apply for that job posting. Also, see my own post above for more reasons as to why we may retain the existing system.