International Brotherhood of Men

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:28 I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:35

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:28 I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:41

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:35

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:28 I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

plus a surrogate mother goes for 100k nowadays, per child, I looked it up. Also you could still get fucked in court if you don't hire a lawyer so it's a diffcult option

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:46

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:41

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:35


I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

plus a surrogate mother goes for 100k nowadays, per child, I looked it up. Also you could still get fucked in court if you don't hire a lawyer so it's a diffcult option

Exactly. These cunts overvalue themselves and their biological utility which itself is nothing miraculous or extraordinary and can now be replicated in a laboratory entirely independent of actual human organic material. We in the IBM seek not merely to dispossess foids of any mechanism whereby they can leverage their innate biology for gain, be in personal, pecuniary or otherwise, but also to ensure that the most disenfranchised of men are provided with equitable consideration and compensation for their having been affirmatively dispossessed of sexual access and the attendant pleasures by the capriciousness of foids and the contrivances of jews.