International Brotherhood of Men

Andros - "Man" in Greek, my name is Andrew Whiteingale, simple? I have to finish quite a long rant and I hope that instead of having it written for the audience in particular, I will redistribute this piece throughout web on occasion that such thing is required. All oratory work might need some literature that help one improve his skills. But with the Internet, I feel that typing has become an oratory in its own feel. Even videos are oratory, and so is that what you read. The Phillipics have also been oratory, may shame be upon the ones who insult righteous fight. Righteous? What is that? Listen, I Andrew Whiteingale, come from long aristocratic bloodline, bloodline of noblemen and noblewomen who fought for what was right, for defence of Poland from enemy oppressors. But have we truly defeated any meritocracy in any way? No matter how much, meritocracy of the humans will always succeed and the deaths during Kalynka massacre in World War 2 and the genocide of jews, of the Holocaust have both played significant roles in undermining the expressio more than anything else done ever. Because deatrh is the ultimate execution of rival. You know, I have been many times removed and it is qutie funny that even an area for men rights have also undermined effort. I guess it is true, I don't submit. To anyone. I am my own man. I live free lifestyle that I adore. So what is righteous? I am afraid I have to say none of you are.I've met people. "Righeous"? I would say they are divided into docile and harming. But not righteous. Many people are docile but once activated to do evil, they do it shamelessly. Violent actions towards men have been happening for so long. Why? Why do men have to die and be tortured all the time? If you want me to acknowledge or to even write down the grudges, then I guess, I would have to make a book that might never even feel different from the book on more or less what you'd call belittling men, talking down on men because it's very difficult to love real modern men. Indeed, if I did write a book with the grudges on man violence it would consist mostly of not women, I am afraid. I am scared to actually say such things as I fear silence. Every time I speak, silence... Silence because men think that the fault is solely on women. For us to be able to create a proper that fights for men, one thing and aspect is something that white people, especially that of southern origin in America and that of racist dumb beliefs will continue doing to the movement which is to destroy it. Let me be clear that racism will never benefit a movement that protects men from violence. And violence and tyrany of women will never be stopped if we men allow ourselves to look like clowns. Looking like clowns, fragile and weak, is by no way supporting. Hear me, hear me! Hear me, men, for I speak to you only. Even if, even if hypothetically if you were to gain power over women, I am afraid to say that you will abuse it. Fellow men, I will keep this as short as needed. So, henceforth, prepare for very very huge amount of information thereis, Andrism, as ideology will succeed only with discipline and cold calculationist viewpoint, not with jealousy definitely. Definitely not. Because, fellow men, jealousy will not get you far. And trust me, under that wrath freedom that women feel entitled to will not fade in their mind. To win, you need more than for men to wedge war but for them to try to be smart, which ultimately requires a great cause. Individual envy and contempt are not things that create great leaders. One's belief must be rationalized. And therefore, I must give in many truths and reveal them to the public in this text.

1.
I am fully aware of the harm that women have done. It goes without saying that it must be addressed before I even speak of the improtance of male movement. But before I get into specifics, we need to again remind ourselves that solely harming women doesn't have beneficial resolution. On that regard, I have been myself mocked and ignored by the masses of men. It seems it's very unpopular to have this thought, of course it's more important to hate women instead of listening to what is right. And ironically, you have to admit that the fact that me saying these simple things formulates anger, on itself is the issue of exchanging hate, so instead of hurting women which you can't do, you immediately hurt the easiest link. Indeed, it is juxtaposition. Hating women, yet insulting fellow men. And I think there is a problem, a large problem with that. Instead of picking the worst scenario that serves no benefit. I want to create a type of man that is not too soft but also that does not follow the archetype that was described in the Greek mythos or in folktale before, to me the idea of European man, the one formed from the steppe is anti-hero, an enemy and direct villain that antogonizes Andrianist wonts and doctine that I saluted. Your hero is that of bitter person, of villain. I can't accept but to deflect and riposte the evil man. Evil for he is envious and hurts other men for his own benefit. Evil and selfish, that is the history of Europe. Without discipline in the Andrist philsophies, how can we ever fight contempory women? It is impossible to defeat them when stabbed in the back, their inferiority complex is not healed and destructive, we can't allow them to lead. Nor we can even take them with us in my cases. For rallying. If you are one of these, that I encourage you to simply hire sexual relief. For you don't believe in anything, let alone into male justice and fight against misandry. It is laughable to fight for masculinity from trash who are as feminine as flowers. But masculinity is corruptable word, ultimately, strength is irrelevant. I cannot but despise masculinity. The modern masculinity.

Now then, regards to women. One of the fundamental truths is that nature revolves around strength but it also demands organization of hierarchy. Many organisms are victorious based on their abilities of working together. Humans excel at that and to be honest in modern age they enjoy very great conditions that are overlooked. These conditions are still very barbaric. Humans are ought to find more spiritual basis for their lifestyle, nevertheless, they choose to adhere to animalistic propaganda and bestial violence that comes from these life styles that very often lack any form of self-sacrifice. I mention, like the other man Carl Marx I have tendency for rediscovering in ancient civilizations. Similar to his hypothesis towards communist tribalism, I am more inclined towards exploring female redistribution. For women redistribution was also a resource, just like any other in the communist form. Before we analyze female misandry and violence towards men, we need to see women's existence in that pre-promethian period. When there were no monogamous marriages, and men were not looking humane nor women had concealers to hide their ugly faces, the sexual competition was brought up with the nature. Another competitor who has joined humans and walked them, but at some point have been outmatched in wits leaving him behind. Nevertheless, nature played major factor in helping the promethian homo erectus evolve and homo sapiens to change themselves to how far stronger they are today as tool makers and hunters, and herders also. As one has said, dogmatism limits person's growth. And so humans have been limited by their animality. But what if nature pulls the towel down? What do we do when we "humans" have no competitor to call "monster", no one to shame as beast? Without the nature, humans cannot make an argument that they are such pampered clergy worthy of their role. Intelligence suffers greatly without coherent and organized enemy, but the enemy role itself is sadistic. Why would anyone want to be enemy of such great opponent and sophist chess player? Let me enlighten you. Nature does not pull plug on competition, it just searches for any ways to improve your demise. The fact that humans enjoy comfort means that our enemy has been planning for very long another demise that they have not announced. We should be ready for Death that it marches onto in us. Then, let me engulf you with this. Biodiversity has never stopped, it continues unlimitedlessly.

We men and women struggled. In struggle, there is common cause that unites romantically, but befroe the lust-formed romance existed it was basic biological necessity. In that tribal environment, women served roles of taking of offspring while men protected them. Women would not have been able to defeat adversaried the men faced. In return, men had to have physical connection, because they are a part of group itself. Unfortunately, very quickly aristocracy and borgoius, as well as monarchy would be invented. Under oppression of one group to another, the distinctions between culture has made it easier to target certain people as slaves and to promote slavery through group associations in the cultural formats. That eventually has led to modern day, communist revolution of Lenin and eventually female absolute power, however absolutism isn't good. No, that is exactly what I need to explain to you. Slavery of any man is difficult. Slavery solely based on skin color is easier to achieve, because you define multiple with the same trait who are minority in society as default prey. Because most people are not scared of becoming slaves, this gives status quo. I mean, it is again both the selfish desire that forms men choices. But again, skin color, faith covenant, any distinction in appearance like for Jews and other Muslims, it plays huge role in racist distinction for the sake of slavery in that misandrist form. Misandrist, for women who use as sexual motive, are never targeted. Therefore, women get away from most of the violence and cannot comprehend nor be trusted, because they are simply away from pain. Simply away from pain is nice to put it. You see, the greatest lie is to believe that the tyrant has suffered more than his slaves. The greatest lie is that women who avoided men and chose evil men throughout histroy are victims when in reality they are even more evil to men that are average, so to speak in clear language. That is where the misandry of women comes from. And that is why we can't ever trust any movement or fill "cuckold" pity towards somebody who wants you to suffer. The basis of this fundamental belief in our philosophy is very simple. Meritocracy tortures men in any gender. The female meritocracy encourages men to suffer. It dreams of the torture of normal men and desires the seeds of riches and supremacy, in general feminism desires death of men. The relationships must be also addressed in history, before we talked about relationship of struggle, now it is a transactional borgouis concept or fake romance built on lust and forged sacrifices of the men and women who do not suffer ever as much as low income men, therefore the meritocratic misandrist women.

In any case, the sacrifices here are way worse than been in tribalism and full of guilt and subversion, in my opinion these are so undesrved that almost anything is justifiable. That is unbelievable how unfair men lives are under meritocracy of women. And men who were chosen. But as you can see, the major problem is sexual treatment of the women by men that is birthed from selfishness and evil. That selfish treatment forms unfair conditions in which women do not suffer and have absolutism. Their absolute power gives zero empathy that we can't beg for, because ultimately they deserve punishment not the kneeling, they deserve justice. Epistemic justice delivery. So, to definte all of that that we said. We must comprehend that selfishness and as that how the organisms use cooperation to succeed does have juxtapositioning with the real society, which means female injustice is improbable to unreason.

All women are naturally evil in epistemic world. Cannot be trusted with feminine freedom, that leads to millions of male graves.

2.

I will continue posting these articles later this day.+

I will have to edit out some mistakes in the future.

2. What is the most important thrive for the male movement is spiritual motivation, for any other motivation soles as derogatory in principle. Let's continue from our conclusion than men are meritocratic slaves in the feminist system, what does feminism stand for? It's been decades since feminism has been implemented, almost a century one might add but it has failed to deliver justice, instead focusing on abusing sexual frustrations of men to make pocket money and lots of money. The real issue has never been rediscovered. In fact, there is no actual issue to address. It never existed, therefore the feminism movement is simply weapon of victimhood and virtuous fever, all but hidden under real reasons of jealousy and desire for dominance and riches, as well as attention of undesirable immoral trash. One of common failures was the underlaying fakeness of ideology, hiding female sexual obsession with anger. No! We cannot possibly be allowing something so horrendous as justice that serves simply as foil for revenge. Revenge without reason, of course. For the best kind of revenge is that of paranoid revenge that never had historical truth. Of course, we already discussed the epistemic feminism, the fact that women never suffer and like all tyrants make terrible choices out of vengeance and harm to slaves who in these cases are all men. Their ideology lacks any form of dignity and is obviously a timid representation of dark sexual conotation for power. The huge misconception that men took, mostly married freeform husbands who have passed these ammendments were that women are abused and in truly natural fashion, they were heraldic by sexism of thought. This constant decision making using sexual preferences is what allows men to give women rights and money to enslave them and make them inferior, same also however implies to women in smaller regard.

Shame! That is a shame! As we can see women will always prefer evil men, the ones who live luxious lifestyles, and the men who sacrifice their dignity. Who makes themselves into clowns for the idea of a man who has a soul is itself ridiculed. Shame that so many wars including nazis and all of World War 2 have been started mostly by women. Women who have given power and encouraged men to do evil, in that regard, oddly I have to say that sexual motivation played major role in making their sons shaped precisely to how they deserve them. Their sons are created from their blood and they do evil by their hands. And in capitalistic borgoueisness, women played major role and now with freedom even deeper role in slavery and the terrible outcome of unfairness. For how can the world be equal when 50% of the country are dormats? How can oppressed class survive against such huge majority that abuses them? The truth, I want all of you men, to listen is to know that you are being played all the time, women want money and power and enjoyment, they do not care for love. Nor will they ever love, their movements are solely oppression and brute manipulations. So, how do we address these issues wholeheartedly? What should I be doing then?

Spiritual motivation is what I wanted to address. For us men the biggest issue is sexual motivation that creates unfair evil men. In the society. Andrism is therefore, I want you to know and believe, for Andrism is thesword or the weapon to battle for male justice and their rights. It is an artillery gun. A tank. It is to fight for rights of men and to fight for their epistemic benefits. But also, it is for sexual acceptance. For their hearts and their representation, as well as defying the alien masculinity which is associated with slavery and sexual obsessions of our society, for it is exactly these things that put most men to death in conflicts and economic inferiorities of meritocracy all by design of surredner to misandry and more than anything, to the sexual urging and motivation, for the sexual motivation is precisely the point, we must accept spiritual motivation of self-sacrifice, something men have known for quite many years for other men. Sacrifice for our movement not for women not for attention or money. Or pleasures or lust of any form. Sacrifice is the most prominent wish for true masculinity. And that lifestyle does not come to being evil.

Sexual acceptance, it is important that men gain acceptance of any form, for sexual motivation cannot be satisfied. But even though it must never be higher than spiritual motivation, it should vanish, which requires quite a lot less pedanticity in this system of fairness. Ultimately, this is something worth discussing in the next section. Remember, we are enemies for if we are not to be oppressed, we will do oppression., for conventional weaponry is constructed in retailation methods and ultimately in some later need for the advantage over evil. Though relying on advantage is in my humble opinion, wrong. Which is why I suggest you to not lose your dignity if you are to be real man, that is if so.

3.
That is if so, if you are a man, then cold retailation is sole reasoning for spiritual lifestyle, requiring a major problem with women. Use any method. It does not matter, for we want society where men can appreciate spiritualism while being free of sex and female violence and abuses, as well as oligarchy and misandry created by their structure.

We want a free class of men, free of sexual misandry not run by the rich folks. For that, few measures I must give. Foremost, women must be flushed from absolute rule, so there needs to be disadvantages, men should never pay for children, it is one of major balances that has to be made to the system of governance, by implying role of education of children about females and the bureucratic governments.
The second is sex, it has been common tragedy that monogamous relatioships suffer from creating male slavery. The ones who are not married will eventually be exploited again for another war and for another slave work force with low wages... It happens so many times because of maritral concept. A concept derived of dominance in non tribalist environment that mostly has no regard to any form of religion nor tradition yet dares to have that legal fraud in its organization. Therefore, marital distributions must be similarily to communist planned economy, be free. I call this, Goblin Cave, a system of not so much good nametag, as much as good reason. In this system all sex is free. Women cannot refuse it and have to even go to certain "cave zones' if necessary. This is absolutely required. For it is to deal exactly with the issue of sexual motivation interfering with regards to wars and fake conflicts, like that of race and faith, that many times have always been testiment to extreme male misandry
These two are non-negotiationable requriements as they are just the bare minimum for constructing male protection from contemporary slavework as usual. The rest of things are more or less derived from the generalization of this concept. However, what I imagine is something perfect, that is bureucratic with no abuse and therefore there needs to be rules that make sex equal to all. If it was not so, then there would be return to oligarchy and other conflict, only in the socialist sex distribution conflict can be avoided. And for the monogamy argument, the truth is, I swear I am speaking it - it has had no value. Women are not loyal, they use marriage as a tool. Marriage has been capitalistically used and we can fix it solely by removing the entire process and embrassing equality instead of controlled anarchy.

Outside of pornography, women are allowed to work and even have representatives in politics, nevertheless the freedom is still limited, ultimately men are the biggest obstacle to peace because this system is quite kind to women.
Of course, there also places to take care for children and other socialist doctrines which might make women enjoy parenting far more.

That is what I request.

in-Conclusion.
I wrote this knowing that this will have misandrist comments and micro aggressive response from enemies of opposite sex. But this is in fact beneficial to many groups and I believe we should support male rights and fight for it is my spiritual destination. I've made lots of counters about unfairness in the meritocracy and there needs to be a sword from a man, not from that side of oligarchs and scammers. Con artists, nor a therapist can help men fix the country. Only the government, or great political leader that will ban and restrict female decisions through complicated war. However, that war can be won with my guidance, under me w00t and other men.

there are some grammatical mistakes however ignore them. I will or you will fix grammatical mistakes later. so that is the first draft and I might be kind of finished. I will like if someone continued or collaborated, but this is it atm. I am thankful you fninished and hopefully you are in this with me because what I desire is justice in male society. Justice, although the final socialist dreams like destroying capitalism and having women tyranny ended are imaginitive they are in fact truthful to possiblity, but the tools of how you get there is up to you to think of that. my friend! Thank you.

I don't hate women .
If a dog barks do you get angry?
Yes sometimes I get but it is dog nature to bark so I simply see women displaying female nature nothing more nothing less

rever wrote: 10 Feb 2025, 08:24 I don't hate women .
If a dog barks do you get angry?
Yes sometimes I get but it is dog nature to bark so I simply see women displaying female nature nothing more nothing less

No, I hate analogies and deem them inferior methods for a weak debate.

Then how should women be viewed ?

Women should be taking care of an offspring with help of state.

Men should work and do other things that help develop country. Some socialist policies have to be formed for that to be achieved. Women are not allowed to make porn, they are not allowed to work adult jobs, they are not allowed to create prostitution demands, but in exhcange there is no monogamy of course! It is a system that removes jealousy but also gives exactly post modern look that is popular in the west, alternative to muslim sharia or jewish hasidic wedding, westerners simply cannot have gender equality without quoting Social Darwinist nazism, which means that this ideology is indeed the greatest that this society that is secular and atheist would have been capable of enacting.

Ratio aequalitatis per valorem humanum. no misandry no women and no mental illness, no tyrany and narcicism nor materialism intent. Made for divine motivation like muslim sharia law is divine motivation not biological desperation that the west believe is good but in reality is hypocritical to male population that is hurt..

I want to read all of this to thoroughly understand your rationale and emotional disposition; however, I am anxious that it would be a waste of my time. Chances are, you will not even reply to this comment, as few seem to care much about what I have to say.

rever wrote: 10 Feb 2025, 08:24 I don't hate women .
If a dog barks do you get angry?
Yes sometimes I get but it is dog nature to bark so I simply see women displaying female nature nothing more nothing less

The dog is biting you so you shall master it. It maybe it's nature but nature can be controlled and you can still hate it as it hurts you, your viewpoint essentially let's women run loose without any consequences.

Orzmund wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 02:51 I want to read all of this to thoroughly understand your rationale and emotional disposition; however, I am anxious that it would be a waste of my time. Chances are, you will not even reply to this comment, as few seem to care much about what I have to say.

very wrong my friend. I care and I understand your dread and loneliness. The pain of man is never valued. Just like the struggle of intelligent thinker or an artist, they are just contemporary entertainment for normie who play by predatory rule.
It's touche that we have been taught wrong things since childhood. Not about how world truly works, but andrism is very favorable and easy word to implement that has nice ring which I mean it sounds better authentically. Instead of comparing it to something like "incel", Andros stands for Male in Ancient Greek, Andrism is ideology of mascuiline rights, in sense dominance or political philosophy, basically andrism world order.

One must live spiritually, but in the end what of it? Why?
At the end, a tyrant will win. A predatory being will succeed, not Nancy McPhee not Willy Wonka or Barney or some other virtous hero, but predator. All mammals originate from evil sleezy predators, and so humans originate from evil predators. Bullies win, simply. The concept of "chad" revolves heavily on bullying, the looks are not sole source of strength. Bullying is by far most attractive male trait humans use while some humans have been fed cattle feed (movies, tv shows and books that mostly point on the fake moral storytelling, often accompanied by fantasy creatures and such who adhere to morality), these feed ruins us. We are manipulated, and ultimately fighting for a form of spirituality that made our lives comfortable at price of goy transformation.
In other words, only bullies can win. Bullies only lose favor when its clear morally speaking that there is not much reason to be afraid of them anymore.
Just russian history itself is example of how cruelty is more powerful. No one complains about no stalin, at all.. That is a trvth we must consume but we shouldn't lose hope.

But ultimately we need to share and understand pain of each other, to be connected in a relationship where we can read each other thoughts. To do that, requires not women but us all men to communicate to each other and listen to one's sufferings, if there is merit between the teeth that speak we will find comradery

And that comradery is exlcusively belonging of us men.