International Brotherhood of Men

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:

Brunette is a 5/10, the blonde is damn near a 7/10. WHY CAN’T I FUCK THESE BITCHES IN REAL LIFE? WHY DOES THE MATRIX ALLOW ME TO LUST AFTER THESE BITCHES BUT NOT STICK MY DICK IN THEIR PUSSY, AND ACTUALLY FUCK THEM? WHY AM I CURSED TO EDGE LIKE THIS? Why?

KingDavid wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:34

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:22

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

I would rate them 6-7/10. Their features are attractive but not uncommon. You can see girls like this all over the Balkans. Also, I've picked their flattering pictures. Here are some more normal ones that might change your rating:

This bitch is a solid, even, proportional 5/10 in my opinion. Not ugly, but not hot either. If she was a morbidly obese fat lard ass bitch her points would drop down to around 3/10.

A 6/10 rating seems reasonable to me. They're certainly fuckable but not anything special as you said. There are girls like this in almost every corner of the Balkans.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:

She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.

KingDavid wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 04:00

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:

Brunette is a 5/10, the blonde is damn near a 7/10. WHY CAN’T I FUCK THESE BITCHES IN REAL LIFE? WHY DOES THE MATRIX ALLOW ME TO LUST AFTER THESE BITCHES BUT NOT STICK MY DICK IN THEIR PUSSY, AND ACTUALLY FUCK THEM? WHY AM I CURSED TO EDGE LIKE THIS? Why?

How is the brunette a 5/10? She looks like she could be an elf out of Lord of the Rings. I don't want to sound like a simp but I genuinely can't conceptualize what a more attractive woman than her would look like.

Vincent wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 06:53

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:

She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.

SMV calculation starts to get a lot more subjective once you get to 8/10 and above. Still, I think most people would agree that the women I've posted in the beginning are around 6/10 and the ones I've posted later are all 9-10/10.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 08:11

Vincent wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 06:53

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:

She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.

SMV calculation starts to get a lot more subjective with 8/10 and above. Still, I think most people would agree that the women I've posted in the beginning are around 6/10 and the ones I've posted later are all 9-10/10.

It's not even possible to compare men with women because men are more variable. It means it is hard to say what a 10 in women looks like. And there are fewer 10s that are women than men. Also there are more men than women, so you cant just compare 2 normal distributions.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 08:11

Vincent wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 06:53

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:

She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.

SMV calculation starts to get a lot more subjective with 8/10 and above. Still, I think most people would agree that the women I've posted in the beginning are around 6/10 and the ones I've posted later are all 9-10/10.

To me, it's the opposite.