Post Your Looksmatches

Talk about anything pertaining to men's rights and the plight of disenfranchised men
User avatar
KingDavid
Senior Soldier
Senior Soldier
Reactions:
Posts: 624
Joined: 10 Jul 2025, 09:44

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?
All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:
Brunette is a 5/10, the blonde is damn near a 7/10. WHY CAN’T I FUCK THESE BITCHES IN REAL LIFE? WHY DOES THE MATRIX ALLOW ME TO LUST AFTER THESE BITCHES BUT NOT STICK MY DICK IN THEIR PUSSY, AND ACTUALLY FUCK THEM? WHY AM I CURSED TO EDGE LIKE THIS? Why?
User avatar
Supreme Misogynist
Reactions:
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Aug 2024, 05:18

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

KingDavid wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:34
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:22
Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.
I would rate them 6-7/10. Their features are attractive but not uncommon. You can see girls like this all over the Balkans. Also, I've picked their flattering pictures. Here are some more normal ones that might change your rating:
This bitch is a solid, even, proportional 5/10 in my opinion. Not ugly, but not hot either. If she was a morbidly obese fat lard ass bitch her points would drop down to around 3/10.
A 6/10 rating seems reasonable to me. They're certainly fuckable but not anything special as you said. There are girls like this in almost every corner of the Balkans.
Professional Clitoris Circumciser
Vincent
Reactions:
Posts: 460
Joined: 16 Nov 2024, 07:14

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?
All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:
She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.
User avatar
Supreme Misogynist
Reactions:
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Aug 2024, 05:18

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

KingDavid wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 04:00
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:
Brunette is a 5/10, the blonde is damn near a 7/10. WHY CAN’T I FUCK THESE BITCHES IN REAL LIFE? WHY DOES THE MATRIX ALLOW ME TO LUST AFTER THESE BITCHES BUT NOT STICK MY DICK IN THEIR PUSSY, AND ACTUALLY FUCK THEM? WHY AM I CURSED TO EDGE LIKE THIS? Why?
How is the brunette a 5/10? She looks like she could be an elf out of Lord of the Rings. I don't want to sound like a simp but I genuinely can't conceptualize what a more attractive woman than her would look like.
Attachments
ab7de-rachel.jpg
6e3fe1dd0d26f1926fba9c5eb31e53d9.jpg
e49a22e9ef8946b6bdfa88e999b95a29.jpg
Professional Clitoris Circumciser
User avatar
Supreme Misogynist
Reactions:
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Aug 2024, 05:18

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Vincent wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 06:53
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:
She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.
SMV calculation starts to get a lot more subjective once you get to 8/10 and above. Still, I think most people would agree that the women I've posted in the beginning are around 6/10 and the ones I've posted later are all 9-10/10.
Last edited by Supreme Misogynist on 05 Oct 2025, 10:58, edited 1 time in total.
Professional Clitoris Circumciser
User avatar
VH911
Soldier
Soldier
Reactions:
Posts: 939
Joined: 23 May 2024, 20:34

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 08:11
Vincent wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 06:53
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:
She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.
SMV calculation starts to get a lot more subjective with 8/10 and above. Still, I think most people would agree that the women I've posted in the beginning are around 6/10 and the ones I've posted later are all 9-10/10.
It's not even possible to compare men with women because men are more variable. It means it is hard to say what a 10 in women looks like. And there are fewer 10s that are women than men. Also there are more men than women, so you cant just compare 2 normal distributions.
Vincent
Reactions:
Posts: 460
Joined: 16 Nov 2024, 07:14

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 08:11
Vincent wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 06:53
Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:51
A 9/10 or 10/10 would look something like the girls below. Not like the ones I've posted:
She is not 10 out of 10 for me. Well, taste is also different from person to person. I find the second chick you posted in the very beginning hotter. The one you just posted would be 8, max 8.5 for me.
SMV calculation starts to get a lot more subjective with 8/10 and above. Still, I think most people would agree that the women I've posted in the beginning are around 6/10 and the ones I've posted later are all 9-10/10.
To me, it's the opposite.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in