International Brotherhood of Men

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 06:17

Vincent wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 12:38 Look, if people could objectively rate their own looks, then polls where people rate themselves from 1 to 10 should average out at 5.5. But in reality, they average much higher.

Do you have any specific objections? You said before that we all posted 10/10s as our looksmatch and that we can't judge things accurately but you never gave any examples. Which posts in this thread do you specifically disagree with?

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 06:17

Vincent wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 12:38 Look, if people could objectively rate their own looks, then polls where people rate themselves from 1 to 10 should average out at 5.5. But in reality, they average much higher.

Do you have any specific objections? You said before that we all posted 10/10s as our looksmatch and that we can't judge things accurately but you never gave any examples. Which posts in this thread do you specifically disagree with?

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 06:17

Vincent wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 12:38 Look, if people could objectively rate their own looks, then polls where people rate themselves from 1 to 10 should average out at 5.5. But in reality, they average much higher.

Do you have any specific objections? You said before that we all posted 10/10s as our looksmatch and that we can't judge things accurately but you never gave any examples. Which posts in this thread do you specifically disagree with?

I can't really say it for anyone specifically, since I don't know how you guys look, so it would be a pointless debate. Can't compare without knowing how you look. The women you posted at first were 10/10. Later you posted some that are not 10/10, so seems a bit more reasonable to me.

But I highly doubt that for example the ones KingDavid posted are his looksmatch. They look like models. The ones you first posted also look like models. In general, people always overestimate themselves and their looks, this goes for both men and women.

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 The women you posted at first were 10/10. Later you posted some that are not 10/10, so seems a bit more reasonable to me.

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 But I highly doubt that for example the ones KingDavid posted are his looksmatch. They look like models.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 The women you posted at first were 10/10. Later you posted some that are not 10/10, so seems a bit more reasonable to me.

Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 But I highly doubt that for example the ones KingDavid posted are his looksmatch. They look like models.

Yeah, I can't say I'm convinced either. I don't know how he looks obviously but if those women are actually his looksmatches then he has to have some severe case of autism or some other mental problem to end up here.

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 15:00 By the way
"The discrepancy was larger among people with higher self-esteem or stronger body image confidence."
In other words, people who may be a bit narcissistc are particularly succeptible to a distorted self-image.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetric and attractive facial features.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 02 Oct 2025, 22:53

KingDavid wrote: 02 Oct 2025, 21:54 My looksmatch.

Those are some exquisite specimens you have adduced for us comrade and I can surmise that you must also be an HTN like myself but afflicted with autism and thus consigned to a purgatorial existence of sexual privation and emotional disconsolation. In a truly fair and just world where all men and foids were given the equitable consideration which they are rightfully due, men like us would be enjoying the pleasures of such gorgeous, Miami class strippers due to both our objectively discernable aesthetic appeal as well as our brilliance and Islamic fitra.

Once the IPF takes command and enslaves these promiscuous harlots, all men of conscience, honor and probity shall be richly rewarded with high echelon Stacy sex slaves whom they can fully indoctrinate with the teachings of the Holy Quran and shall be at liberty to issue routine beatings to so as to ensure proper domesticity.

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 06:17

Vincent wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 12:38 Look, if people could objectively rate their own looks, then polls where people rate themselves from 1 to 10 should average out at 5.5. But in reality, they average much higher.

Do you have any specific objections? You said before that we all posted 10/10s as our looksmatch and that we can't judge things accurately but you never gave any examples. Which posts in this thread do you specifically disagree with?

I can't really say it for anyone specifically, since I don't know how you guys look, so it would be a pointless debate. Can't compare without knowing how you look. The women you posted at first were 10/10. Later you posted some that are not 10/10, so seems a bit more reasonable to me.

But I highly doubt that for example the ones KingDavid posted are his looksmatch. They look like models. The ones you first posted also look like models. In general, people always overestimate themselves and their looks, this goes for both men and women.

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:20 Just some studies on self-rating of looks. People don't rate themselves objectively.

There are several studies showing that people tend to overestimate their own attractiveness. Here are some of the most cited and relevant ones:

1. Epley & Whitchurch (2008) – “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Enhancement in Self-Recognition.”

Published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Participants were shown a series of photos of themselves that had been subtly altered to look more or less attractive.
When asked to identify which one was the real, unedited photo, people overwhelmingly chose the more attractive, enhanced versions of themselves.
This shows a clear bias toward seeing oneself as better-looking than one actually is.

2. Swami et al. (2010) – “Perceived Attractiveness and Self-Rated Attractiveness.”

Published in Body Image.
Participants rated their own attractiveness and were also rated by independent observers.
On average, self-ratings were significantly higher than observer ratings.
The discrepancy was larger among people with higher self-esteem or stronger body image confidence.

3. Epley & Dunning (2000) – “Feeling ‘Holier Than Thou’: Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self or Social Prediction?”

While not only about looks, this broader study on self-assessment bias found that people generally overestimate their own positive qualities compared to how others see them — including intelligence, morality, and appearance.

4. Bleske-Rechek & Remiker (2019) – “Attractive Self-Enhancement: Self-Ratings and Partner Ratings of Physical Attractiveness.”

Published in Personality and Individual Differences.
Both men and women rated themselves as more attractive than their partners rated them, even when relationship satisfaction was high.

All of these point to a consistent pattern: people think they look better than others think they do.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 The women you posted at first were 10/10. Later you posted some that are not 10/10, so seems a bit more reasonable to me.

Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 But I highly doubt that for example the ones KingDavid posted are his looksmatch. They look like models.

Yeah, I can't say I'm convinced either. I don't know how he looks obviously but if those women are actually his looksmatches then he has to have some severe case of autism or some other mental problem to end up here.

KingDavid wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 19:19

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 The women you posted at first were 10/10. Later you posted some that are not 10/10, so seems a bit more reasonable to me.

Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:16 But I highly doubt that for example the ones KingDavid posted are his looksmatch. They look like models.

Yeah, I can't say I'm convinced either. I don't know how he looks obviously but if those women are actually his looksmatches then he has to have some severe case of autism or some other mental problem to end up here.

It’s autism bro. Honestly they’re not my looksmatches those bitches are like 8/10 9/10 and 10/10 but as a 5/10-7/10 looking man I can’t even fuck a 1/10, 2/10, or 3/10 ugly fat bitch either in person or on a dating app. That’s proof it’s autism right there.

VH911 wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 19:37

KingDavid wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 19:19

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52
Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

Yeah, I can't say I'm convinced either. I don't know how he looks obviously but if those women are actually his looksmatches then he has to have some severe case of autism or some other mental problem to end up here.

It’s autism bro. Honestly they’re not my looksmatches those bitches are like 8/10 9/10 and 10/10 but as a 5/10-7/10 looking man I can’t even fuck a 1/10, 2/10, or 3/10 ugly fat bitch either in person or on a dating app. That’s proof it’s autism right there.

Thats not even proof that the reason is autism.
Its just impossible for even average men.

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 05 Oct 2025, 03:22

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.

I would rate them 6-7/10. Their features are attractive but not uncommon. You can see girls like this all over the Balkans. Also, I've picked their flattering pictures. Here are some more normal ones that might change your rating:

Vincent wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 18:01

Supreme Misogynist wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:52 Which ones were 10/10? Can you quote the Images?

All of the first 3 images you posted in the thread can be considered either 9 or 10 / 10. Highly symmetrical and attractive facial features.