Re: Poll: who is most responsible for men not getting dates?
Posted: 09 Jun 2024, 22:26
It's all about genetics. Women don't excpect too much, they are biologically wired to want this, so you better start blaming your shit genetics.

mensrights.space - Fighting for a Better World for Men
https://mensrights.space/forum/
Darth_aurelius wrote: 09 Jun 2024, 11:38I think women are obviously a part of the problem but that it requires a more holistic and comprehensive assessment which lends itself to a more circumspect analytical framework. The calculus invariably includes the simps however as without the validation which they provide foids, these whores wouldn't feel as though they have a grossly inflated sense of self-grandiosity which causes them to be far more discerning and selective then they rightfully should be. The asymmetry between women's selection criteria and that which men use has become even greater over the last few decades and I believe that social media (mostly IG) is a tremendous force multiplier.Nagger wrote: 09 Jun 2024, 02:35 It's mostly women's fault because they think that they're so much better than men nowadays. Obviously equal rights are also problematic because in order to achieve equality one must boink men on the head.
So I'd say that it's mostly the first thing coupled with what some might call the "degeneration" of western society.
I personally wouldn't call it degeneracy because I think that morality is relative, however the results of going from a "everything goes if you're strong" to this faggy, plushy, feely touchy society has disadvantaged every single man. I'm not saying that everything was better 200 years ago, hell no! If you weren't a christcuck then you were basically untouchable, however things were better from a purely social and sexual point of view for men.
As for morality, yes I completely agree that it is subjective otherwise you would have to assert that it is somehow innate and intrinsically or biologically ingrained in to humans which is a farcical proposition considering the massively divergent moral paradigms that we have seen regnant throughout history. That being said, I think there is what one might regard as a sort of moral consensus or an equilibrium, the sort of thing that Rawls was talking about when he posited his veil of ignorance and suggested that a perfectly conceived society must have laws and ethics that are created by a future constituent member of that society who doesn't know where in the socio-demographic strata he will be situated.