Opinions on shrinking population?

[Vincent]

Ok, so as many of you brothers probably know, we are dealing with shrinking populations and collapsing birthrates worldwide. People say all kinds of reasons for it, but somehow nobody sees the most obvious ones:
1. Allowing women to study & work, therefore delaying their childbirth
2. Shaming early marriage

I tell you what, Afghanistan certainly doesn't have issues with low fertility under the taliban. Yet all the foids and their simps are crying about it, all the cancerous foid organizations in the west.

Afghanistan: Marriage Practice Victimizes Young Girls, Society
https://www.rferl.org/a/1079316.html

Even Iraq is dealing with collapsing birth rates. Now they want to lower the marriage age to 9 and the whole foid-world cries out against it:

Child marriage at 9? Iraq's controversial law ignites fiery protests
https://www.business-standard.com/world ... 638_1.html

Yet that would literally prevent the population collapse. What do you think?

[General Alek]

I guess it means less of a shortage of resources, which is good

[Vincent]

I guess it means less of a shortage of resources, which is good

Nope. If the composition of the population were to remain the same and only the numbers were to shrink, you would be right. But that is not the case. What happens is you continuously have far more older than younger people, because the birthrates continue to plummet. So young people have to work their asses off to pay off social welfare for the old.

[VH911]

► Show Spoiler

I guess it means less of a shortage of resources, which is good

Nope. If the composition of the population were to remain the same and only the numbers were to shrink, you would be right. But that is not the case. What happens is you continuously have far more older than younger people, because the birthrates continue to plummet. So young people have to work their asses off to pay off social welfare for the old.

+ the massmigration which consists of mostly young men, who replace europeans.

[PoodankMcGee]

I'm kindve torn on it. On the one hand I lean towards antinatalism. Reproduction is inherently selfish and unethical creating more incels, evil normies, and suffering into the world. More people creates more competition for resources. Ideally humanity would fuckin go extinct completely.

If we lived in a sane world less people would be a good thing economical as less resources would need to be extracted and processed to support the population. But unfortunately we live in a hypercapitalistic global order where everything is structured around perpetual growth.

Ideally we would reconfigure our economic system so the birth rates dont matter, especially as technology advances and most work becomes automated. But realistically governments will either repeal womens rights to breed more babies into them (based) or as @VH911 mentioned western nations will import shitskins from the third world countries who do breed a lot (cringe).

[TheRapist]

I'm kindve torn on it. On the one hand I lean towards antinatalism. Reproduction is inherently selfish and unethical creating more incels, evil normies, and suffering into the world. More people creates more competition for resources. Ideally humanity would fuckin go extinct completely.

If we lived in a sane world less people would be a good thing economical as less resources would need to be extracted and processed to support the population. But unfortunately we live in a hypercapitalistic global order where everything is structured around perpetual growth.

Ideally we would reconfigure our economic system so the birth rates dont matter, especially as technology advances and most work becomes automated. But realistically governments will either repeal womens rights to breed more babies into them (based) or as @VH911 mentioned western nations will import shitskins from the third world countries who do breed a lot (cringe).

I agree! This is such an insightful and well informed opinion!
However, you have to take into account that our current soyceity that loves licking the boots of globalist corporations and the elites (since their smug asses think that replacing religion with progressivism is the key to happiness) would rather shrink itself to extinction and let only the elites breed and maintain a traditional family (while they openly brainwash the masses into thinking that such model of society is oppressive to toilets).
Funnily enough the elites are calm enough to maintain patriarchal structures wherein they can submit their foids (such cases are well hidden since they weasel out of the punishment with their wealth) but love enforcing the idea that a free toilets with privileges over males who would rather abort chad's kids is an ideal and prosperous world (which funnily isn't
Their plan all along is to make sure only politicians, wealthy people and the top of the elites breed like rabbits while hoarding all the resources of the planets at the expense of the braindead masses who would rather starve sexually and literally while toilets are given a carte blanche in their debauchery

[whiteingale]

with the way foids treat me in general, I don't consider shrinking populations to be genuinely real.