"dark intellectuals" abuse the idea of academia censorin

[Sustacel250]

By "dark intellectual" I mean these people who pretend their ideas are novelty while they shamelessly copy and steal and write low quality materials that would get rejected. So they go out and pretend their materials are rejected, not because low quality but because they are "revolutionary and important".

People like Nick Land, or Peterson or IDK like also that dude Curtis Yarvin.

I read curtis I was thinking if hes serious or not. I mean he had endless blog posts with expositions of what he considers to be a "leftist mentality", they read as a dialog with himself, shadow boxing, while he pretends leftists think in a specific way but hes superior so he shows a "GOTCHA!" flaw of their reasoning and it supposedly demonstrates his next point.

Now, academia maybe does really censors him, but its not because hes such a revolutionary thinker or anything, is simply that his style is not even presentable. The slums of Catania would kindly redirect him to a ghostwriter, and there are many you can pay and for 3000 bucks they compile excellent theses. Catania would simply tell him "hey buddy, lets not pretend youre big shot, here let me introduce you to some excellent ghost writers".

At least trump payed a ghostwriter. These "dark intellectuals" make me appreciate more the profession of ghost writing.