William Lupinacci was translating Basaglia. William basically was antifascist and this motivated him to pursue anti-psychiatry same as Basaglia, he came to know of him simply due to his leftist inclinations.
So, right wing incel spinoffs probably will have no method whatsoever to criticize the psychiatry profession. I didnt see any right wing spinoff attempting the same quest. Instead in the right wing circles I seen more often people who passively accept the "reality of life" of the pharma industry, and they are also institutionalized more often than not. They seem to believe every word from the psychiatrist, they began to take pills very early in their life, and their right wing inclination does not allows them to criticize what they deem as "authority" and psychiatrists are "authority figures".
So can there be an anti-psichiatry incel perspective under right wing incel persuasion? I dont think so. The closest was from jordan peterson whos more aligned with christian conservative centrist positions. Pure right wing isnt interested in psychiatry and the wellbeing of incel men. Over the years, no right wing spinoff developed any criticism of psychiatry this is a fact.
So we can forget the quest for demolishing psychiatry. But can we at least find relief for homeless? Nah. Not even that one. I am currently aware of no right wing incel collective that even took the perspective into consideration. I mean, I have been in ALL the incel spinoffs. And even Nathan Larson who was jailed for paedophilia was capable of considering the homeless situation. Except the incel groups into right wing, they dont care, they dont even register it as "an issue". So I conclude no right wing incel cares about the homelessness problem, its not even an issue in their mind.
Under left wing incelism, there was also a perspective related to work and slavery. there was a possibility to consider the realities of work environment and joblessness. Is there an equivalent under right wing inceldom? I only observed critics of modernity with the traditionalist perspective offering a similar perspective, yet not quite the same. Because the traditionalist people only care of "society should give me a woman in exchange of my labor". I mean, yeah, thats all they got. They dont have anything else to offer. So you can forget this incel topic too.
We cannot advocate for prositution. Right wincels are either opposed or they boycott us or they disregard the issue entirely and if youre lucky the right wincel is in love with andrew tate so he participates to prostitution as a client. But this is really the best they got. For a right wincel to consider the topic it takes for him to be part of andrew tate community, otherwise he will never have any idea about it. Its like being right winger is to be a psychopatic who only cares about himself and is unable to conceive others have problems.
We cannot be anti-feminist. I mean, the right wing surely does have some anti-feminist perspectives, this is one of the areas where there could be some alliance going on. But the right wincels are unable to describe feminism. On the contrary right wingers are described by feminism. So the relationship is inverse, its the right winger who has his identity constructed by feminism, and they accept every premise of feminism, including that one pertaining to patriarchy. The rigth winger is thus unable to be of help when it cmes to feminism and issues related. And their perspectives on antifeminism are mostly based on demonstrably false conspiracies such as "cultural marxism" or "the masons did feminism" or they blame it all on the jews.
On jew topics, can the right wing perspective be of help? I say no. Because the right wingers dont know the jew either, their attitude of superficiality and eceleb worship mostly puts the right winger in a position where he blames jews for all issues. Right wingers will mostly be "antisemites", they will be agitated by jews to go in jewish neighborhoods and distribute flyers or to perform edgy stunts, they mostly gather metheads and crack addicted ex convicts and agitate the prison members with psyops. Unfortunately they are of no help here.
Can right wingers advocate for incels right to have sexual life? No they cant. Because to a right winger, a right to have sex means they want to rape people in the streets. They are unable to conceive a woman can have preferences and select men, they go apeshit, they are insanely butthurt, such is their psychopathy they cannot understand. They think femcels dont exist, they hate everyone who doesnt thinks EXACTLY like them. They are more after feels or mood and vibe.
Right wincel gives no method to advocate incel rights
-
Sustacel250
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
