Ranking heroes and saints.

[Sustacel250]

Since when I was a teenager I always liked the genre of heroism and the saints. Probably police knows I have an interest in saints, because I dont even hide nor I use vpn and I have no problem justifying why I collected all these saints works and materials. Its not illegal and I dont have anything to hide, and it was known since I was a teencel that I was fascinated with saints and heroes.

Well, over the years I seen all these saints and I thought the most important thing is target selection. Because saints come from all sorts of ideologies and religions. So it becomes hard to say if a cause is just or isnt. Because, if you read a communist saint manifesto, and youre not a communist you will read it and think to yourself that the saint in question was under the effect of delusion and cope, because the rationalizations and the language of communism will not make sense to you.

Problem of ideologies is they initiate a normie with a coded language made of symbols, each ideology programs a normie like a robot, and they end up repeating ideas (not their own anymore). If you are not familiar with the language of the ideology you will read a saint and will be unable to understand the meaning.

Inside communism they use coded language like this: alienation, capitalism, proletariat, bourgeoisie, ideology, false consciousness, dictatorship, historical materialism, revolution... So on.

Some of these words have been used also by adversaries of communism, so they changed meaning over time. And so it happens that if you want to understand the cause of a hero, you need to also know his sociology. And frankly, when some hero is animated by ideology or religion I find it kinda pathetic and I dont like it. I mean, i think often that ideology subtracts from the gesture of heroism, its like stain of diarrhea on a dress.

The sociology of modernity is often an adversary of communism and uses the following words: modernity, industrialization, urbanization, differentiation, bureaucracy, disenchantment, anomie, individualization (seen negatively). Since this second sociology is radically different from communism, you have to know this second set of ideas to tackle the manifestos of another hero that was influenced by the sociology of modernity.

In a way, I think heroes will teach you multiple languages, because the young incel will read these manifestos and will at first be unable to comprehend what was animating the hero. Later, things will start to become clear, the more words you learn and the more languages you know, the more you comprehend the genre of heroes and saints.

But with wisdom, knowledge and comprehension also comes disillusionment. You will see then, that the ideas of the heroes were wrong, or you disagree subjectively with the ideas. Or maybe the ideas will outright look laughable to you.

What instead can remain true despite the ideas are wrong is target selection. For example, if a hero targets the innocent no matter if his ideas are good or bad, hes doing something wrong. If the hero instead targets the guilty (like a banker) and the hero is intentional and precise when he strikes the normies, then his ideas start to matter less and the hero finally transforms himself into art as is meant to be.

The idea of being a hero is to do great gestures. You dont have to strike normies, I mean youre not forced to. You can leave a mark in the world with many other methods. But if the hero was striking normies, I will usually pay attention to target selection. If the hero targeted harmless normies in a club then the hero was a coward, his actions subtract value from his ideas. So even if the hero was a master writer and very good at writing manifestos what will result is the content of his actions will speak louder than his poetic words on paper.

Its rare that a hero can do it all, because heroes are men of actions and its not granted they also mastered the pen. Usually a hero is a person who finds what is true or false in the midst of battle, they are people who dont see straight unless they face challenges. So I concluded that is completely unfair to take the manifesto of a hero, read it, and pretend as if what is written there is true.

In any case. What do you value when you observe the hero or the saint? I value target selection and I dont value ideology. So for example my favorite heroes are the red brigades incels. Because they were masters of target selection. They selected judges, cops and punished evil industrialists. In a nutshell they were people who spoke little and acted more, they were the stereotypical hero. They spoke in slogans and short sentences, they were very rude and had a farmer background, few of them went to school, some went to work in factories. Their actions were speaking loud and clear. None of them needed to write a manifesto, which is unfortunate because their life was narrated by journalists. But the art they left luckily is as clear as day. That is the epitome of heroism I seen so far in recent days.