Basically a while ago there was this debate online about the whore wars. I am sure some clever media manager created the debate on purpose but whatever I have a take on this debate. I sum it up, TLDR I think is temple prostitute vs entrepreneur prostitute millennia old debate.
In the course of history of philosophy I did in HS there was a chapter on whore morality, it was saying one of the oldest questions in ancient greece was when you should prostitute your wife. Some say before marriage is the ideal prostitution model, some say after marriage. Some city states had different laws, it was a time where anarcho capitalism existed in real life with different city states and different courts as imagined by some schizo libertarians of contemporary times. So in the same geographical location coexisted models of prostitution vastly different from one another.
There is a simp faction sides with bonnie blue, and another simp faction sides with Sophie Rain. In the debate bonnie blue vs sophie rain my take was this one: Morally I think Bonnie Blue was right, because Bonnie Blue normalizes the idea a whore should be a whore and should have sex. The moral attitude of bonnie blue is honest labor, she probably comes from a laborer family of workers because she had sex in battery with hundreds of men performing astonishing whore stunts she became almost a comedy-level hero like stakanov stories. Its obvious shes a performer and she was doing artistic stunts but whatever, the attitude is still admirable. Prostitution is work is her idea, and she performs the most stunts so she probably thinks shes the better most performant whore around.
Yet despite I side morally with bonnie blue for her outstanding work ethic as a prostitute, I still dont like her physically and I didnt fap her. Also some lookist incels told me Bonnie Blue is ugly and she did surgery. I lack the bionic lookismcel eye for surgery, I dont givafuk about surgery. I was basing my judgement on the things I seen on porn websites. I seen bonny blue is nothing special, she has a nice body but I dont like the shape of her vagina and I dont find her whore performance very good. But yeah her working ethic is worth of consideration, bonnie normalizes the idea whores should have physical sex rather than sell coping and ask monthly payments to simps.
I fap sophie rain. I think shes also right, in her own way. She has another performance philosophy which I find less convincing and I also contested on other forums. I dislike this idea of diluting contents, asking "support" on patreon or onlyfans or offer parasocial relationship. I prefer a model of prostitution where men actually have physical sex. Some incels disagree with me, they are from an incel faction that wants to pursue association with women to "ascend" in society or because they want to be validated. Instead im from an incel faction that is focused on performance, sex and material reality. Im a materialist incel so I have a perspective based on measurable objective phenomena.
Overall there are different performance philosophies, and I dont think one is right above all. I simply see some clashes of ideas represented by the heroes of our times sophie and bonnie blue. There always has been a battle between the temple prostitute and the entrepreneur adversarial prostitute. I think bonnie represents the entrepreneural spirit of the wild prostitute, and sophie is a temple prostitute.
I mean, you are probably right if you think both of them are temple prostitutes. But bonnie is a performer with a social message which is "This is porn, I am a whore, and I perform sex", basically the idea is her work is her identity, probably she comes from hard laborer family. Instead sophie is like this "I perform desire and playfulness, its just edging tension and fantasy, youre not going to have actual sex with me".
In any case, I think both of them are excellent workers. I would say i prefer bonnie blue for her ideas but I think sophie is very beautiful. Yeah she was born lucky because she got super awesome curves.
For those who dont know a temple prostitute is basically a prostitute that works for the temple. Imagine shamhat in gilgamesh story it was a type of prostitute that represented the temple and worked for it, ensnaring men and tricking people for the benefit of the religion that controlled her performance and legitimized her actions. A temple prostitute is the idea that christian people on social media have, they want essentially to have a wife-prostitute. The image is a woman that uses her beauty to trick men, like lauren southern, but the woman was owned by the temple all along.
Read the stories of the son of elliot rodger on this forum to understand temple prostitutes, he encountered the christian ones and they scrambled his brain with their tricks and their allure.
The idea is the "sacred prostitute" can be a singer, a priestess, a motivator girl like the ones hired in asian companies, or he diviners, or woman who is supposed to be wise and gives you the blowjob and counsels the lost men in society. I seen the idea of the temple prostitute also represented inside of feminism, some feminists also ensnared incel men lost in life giving them rationalizations and teaching "a way to be in the world" to the incel men. For instance in the past, feminism was unleashing lots of temple prostitutes, they conquered a generation of boomer marxists who joined second wave feminism, they also conquered half of the incel community with the critique of masculinity. Lots of incels wanted to be represented by momma feminist, and they would lose themselves ensnared by the chants of the sirens. That is a "temple prostitute.
Since as an incel I represent a materialist faction inside incel scene, i dislike very much the idea of temple prostitution and I favor an adversarial entrepreneur model where we challenge both temple and the state authority, so I favor approaches like carla corso or pia covre where the prostitute is understood as a human with agency who chooses and sells to me her body due to private contracts between individuals.
I am not here to impose my point of view even if my bias became evident over time. I am not a neutral incel and I dont want to be neutral and pretend I dont have a bias. I presented to you my honest opinion, obviously if you read my messages you can clearly see i have a low opinion of incels who favor temple prostitutes. I will tell you, I think my perspective is right and i do feel superior. Cope and seethe if you dont like it, its simply how i see it.
But if you have another perspective I swear I will respect it.
