Redistribution contradicts validation.

[Sustacel250]

Obviously redistributing humans is nonsense. Even elites dont do it, elites commerce humans, sell slaves and buy sex. Nobody redistributes any human and you should always pay attention to human history to learn a thing or two.

Since it never happened in history, we can do a thought experiment and imagine what is this "redistribution". What I think is redistribution of sex would only psychologically satisfy someone who views sex as a consumable resource, which is quite a rare occurrence in the humanity I know.
But if someone real goal is "validation" (be chosen and desired by foids) then the idea of redistribution undermines and refutes the idea of validation. Because the person in question requires an external source to "be validated", the person requires the woman to give him sort of a mystical grace, which cannot be distributed and requires consent.

Only someone with an internal source of validation can see sex a consumable resource, and can thus profit from a redistribution. I conclude that a person who requires external validation advocating for redistribution is contradicting his own needs, he creates a self-refuting proposition.

There are only 2 possible ways. Option 1 you treat sex like is food, and you problematize access to sex. I mean, you make a contorted rhetoric around the idea of access to sex to convey the illusion "its a problem" similar to what feminists do with rape narratives. You argue that redistribution solves scarcity (of sex) and validation is irrelevant. See here, you need to remove the idea of validation for your deception to work.

The second option you have, is you build a rhetoric trickery around the idea of validation. You say sex is a symbol of desirability in society and sex gives you access to society. But redistribution destroys symbolic value, which is why communism always had evident limits. If this second model is true the first isnt and also redistribution will not solve the core issue if you frame validation as an issue.

I make it even simpler. If you say "I want to be loved or desired by foids". And then you say "Sex should be distributed". You just contradicted yourself right here. Redistribution of sex (if it was even possible) would only give you physical release, and redistribution is structurally incapable of solving validation. Validation is inherently subjective, redistribution always operates under objective meters.

What it reveals is a wrong diagnosis from incel scene. You either seek consumption or seek validation (subjective meaning, changes from incel to incel). Many incels also get into communism, do they know that communism attempts to be scentific? I think they dont. Communism is explicitly materialist, its not about subjective feelings like "validation". So if your problems are symbolic (validation or ascension), they can never be fixed by material redistribution. I think I already showed you why.