Normshits piss me off with their obsession over Epstein
-
Vincent
- Reactions:
- Posts: 577
- Joined: 16 Nov 2024, 07:14
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
YES WE GET IT OK? We get it, he was a jew who railed teens for money. Big deal. Happened all throughout history until you made it unnormal with your CUCKED behavior. Now can you fucking shut up your stupid mouth? I don't wanna hear you rambling on and on about him 24/7 as if there is nothing else going on in the entire world.
-
Sustacel250
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1730
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
I disagree is a big deal.
Its a big deal because it opens people to the world of conspiracy truth. Its a proven documented conspiracy. Its something that I can talk about offline without a shitty normie telling me "but where is the proof". I mean, I could also offer no proof whatsoever, the normie will believe me simply because he heard of epstein on normie media. Obviously do not expect normies to have collected "the proof". For the normies "the proof" is simply the fact normie media had talked about it.
So for me is a big deal and you gotta watch out for people reinterpreting the story or people who want to make you perceive as if truth is not real. Some people are damage controlling the narrative since a while, they have the goal of confusing your senses, so you cannot come to rational conclusions even if you know the story. That is a real peril around this epstein stuff but i find it an optimal method to inject even more conspiracy. I pump a nomie with conspiracy every time I can. This epstein hole is really massive.
Who was the owner of the compromat? was it putin, was it mossad, or what about both of them? I dont know yet. I suspect both of them. Is it relevant for us? 100% it is. The epstein situation is relevant for the online discussion. It is relevant to know if your leaders are blackmailed infiltrated foreign funded. It is relevant to know if the ecelebs connected to the politician media are trustworthy or not. For instance, what about tuker carson or nick fuentes? They are connected both to the trump media. Would you trust them now that you know of epstein files? I wouldnt but I didnt trust them before either.
A downside of Epstein discussion, as usual, is that normies will get into it. Normies with their knowitall answers, normies who do not want to open an investigation and already know it all, normis who refuse to get deep into a topic. My exp tells me these normies are dead weight and they can drag conversations over 20 years. So if you dont like epstein stuff now, prepare to hear it for the next 20 years. It happened also with 911, some people really cannot tolerate the mention of 911 another time... because for 20 years people talked of nothing else.
But you should notice also something else. How many normies did investigate 911 after having talked about it for 20 years? the % is so low is shocking, they had 20 years of time and they still rely on mainstream media sources about an event. They could have searched it, yet they didnt. And now they act pissed if they hear the event mentioned again. Think about it, this is the nature of normies.
Its a big deal because it opens people to the world of conspiracy truth. Its a proven documented conspiracy. Its something that I can talk about offline without a shitty normie telling me "but where is the proof". I mean, I could also offer no proof whatsoever, the normie will believe me simply because he heard of epstein on normie media. Obviously do not expect normies to have collected "the proof". For the normies "the proof" is simply the fact normie media had talked about it.
So for me is a big deal and you gotta watch out for people reinterpreting the story or people who want to make you perceive as if truth is not real. Some people are damage controlling the narrative since a while, they have the goal of confusing your senses, so you cannot come to rational conclusions even if you know the story. That is a real peril around this epstein stuff but i find it an optimal method to inject even more conspiracy. I pump a nomie with conspiracy every time I can. This epstein hole is really massive.
Who was the owner of the compromat? was it putin, was it mossad, or what about both of them? I dont know yet. I suspect both of them. Is it relevant for us? 100% it is. The epstein situation is relevant for the online discussion. It is relevant to know if your leaders are blackmailed infiltrated foreign funded. It is relevant to know if the ecelebs connected to the politician media are trustworthy or not. For instance, what about tuker carson or nick fuentes? They are connected both to the trump media. Would you trust them now that you know of epstein files? I wouldnt but I didnt trust them before either.
A downside of Epstein discussion, as usual, is that normies will get into it. Normies with their knowitall answers, normies who do not want to open an investigation and already know it all, normis who refuse to get deep into a topic. My exp tells me these normies are dead weight and they can drag conversations over 20 years. So if you dont like epstein stuff now, prepare to hear it for the next 20 years. It happened also with 911, some people really cannot tolerate the mention of 911 another time... because for 20 years people talked of nothing else.
But you should notice also something else. How many normies did investigate 911 after having talked about it for 20 years? the % is so low is shocking, they had 20 years of time and they still rely on mainstream media sources about an event. They could have searched it, yet they didnt. And now they act pissed if they hear the event mentioned again. Think about it, this is the nature of normies.
-
Vincent
- Reactions:
- Posts: 577
- Joined: 16 Nov 2024, 07:14
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Why do you even care about it? Why is it important?
-
Sustacel250
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1730
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Not to be offensive but I already explained the reasons. I do a TLDR maybe a list of points.
I care because:
- Its a proven conspiracy for which I can access data.
- recognized by normies by virtue of being discussed on normie media. Discuss on normie media = true. (in the world of normies)
- Allows me to discover who owns who in the world of politics. Its a big leverage in public debate, allows me to cut the head of MAGA hydras.
- The issue is yet to be researched fully but I find it already insightful. I could expand on it but you already said you are too fed-up with it.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
