Redpill psyop. I sum it up

[Sustacel250]

The goal of society is to create structures to ensure paternity. Military exists to protect women. Before christianity, men did bloodshed to ensure they were really the father of the kid they were fathering. Marriage is all about sexual redistribution and egalitarianism, because each gets 1 wife and not more, so we ensure stability because men will not have to endlessly fight one another for pussy. Marriage protects paternity.

Sexual competition is the root of violence. Violence in their framing is "male violence". What they say also is men are "biologically driven" to compete for sexual opportunities and inseminate all women. If not for christianity men would actually do it, and it would be bad. Because society would collapse.

I got these concepts from jordan peterson, nick fuentes, manuresphere influencers and also tucker carson. They all repeat the same talking points so they are very suspicious to me. Why all of them repeat them? Its as if their goal all along was promoting christianity. In any case let me go on.

They say historically all social mechanisms were built to regulate female sexuality. Different than feminism they say this is a good thing while feminism starts from ther same exact premise to say its a bad thing. The difference between feminism is negligible, they assume the same event occurred, they just interpret it positively or negatively in the case of feminism.

Religion is good. Monogamy is going to be considered a virtue and a symbol of restraint. Obviously it would be gracious restraint only if chad whos doing it because I doubt highly an incel in a marriage is restrained. In any case, they say monogamy gives us stable nuclear families and allows us to self-police instead of doing endless violence (violence = male violence in their feminist-redpill framing).

Now lets explore why this narrative is specifically engineered to appeal to incels. Incels will be framed as surplus men created by deregulated sexual markets. THe narrative of "surplus men" also favors the pro-war pro-intervention policies of these christian conservatives. Surplus men will be glad to go die in a war, because as they are told "surplus men destabilize society". This may seem self hate if you observe it from the outside but this explanation is fairly popular inside incel scene.

What is social decline in the redpill perspective? its about sexual deregulation. Keyword "deregulation", it implies there were rules and they were removed. Falling birthrates, decline of marriage, male losers (neets and gollumcels on forums), all of them are a product of a failed deregulated system where some chads have sex and all women are whores. This narrative has a ton of incel ears listening to it.

Peterson says: if society does not offers men status and theres no sexual access with marriage, and no man has "meaning" and legacy. Then men will not contribute any longer, become violent ad turn to authoritarianism to fix their own life. So peterson acts as the "concerned person serious scholar who warns us about authoritarianism". The solution they advise is get into christianity which will solve all problems. This, I think, was copy pasted from the ratzinger books about nazis and the role of the church.

In this great story, christianity is the solution, its the fix to all issues. It really reminds me of the ratzinger books. Ratzinger was saying nazism was a result of a moral vacuum when christianity got weaker normies went into authoritarianism. And after that, they seek solution for their shitlife, they turn to hitler. But this is result from having removed christianity, and the solution is to put the church in charge and stop hitler. Seems like the redpill gurus did read ratzinger. They really mimick this guy arguments.