Communism has no definition for "bourgeoisie"

[Sustacel250]

Or maybe they have too many definitions. Marx failed to define it. But others stepped in to fill his void. For instance marcuse stepped in with a definition: Bourgeoisie is the wealthiest part of society which seeks to impose its will on the population.

But dont expect online people into communism to follow strictly this or another definition because they have hundreds. its a problem of language and in communism nobody follows the same one. It was fun to think that feminists deeply desire to describe "bourgeoisie" as simply "all men" and black racist movements would describe it as "all white people". Indians.is instead describes it as "chads and stacy" and in their relative perspective I am "JBW bourgeoisie".

When I first came into conflict with communism I was very very young and I wanted to define my own targets for hatred. The communist orthodoxy instead wants me to be "organized" against an imaginary bourgeosie. For instance the class I clash against is intellectuals. Because I went to school and I was arguemaxing against them. Basically im a competitor against intellectuals. What they told me instead is I have to follow their orthodoxy which at the time was "hate the bourgeoisie", but none defined them. It was all arbitrary and they would label specific rich people, not even "all of them". For instance they would label "conservatives" but would omit to mention the progressive rich people. Or they would mention "nationalists" but avoid to mention rich people with internationalist tendencies. Or they would mention "idealists" but they would never target a rich guy funding their local marxist collective.

If I had to follow this Marcuse definition, then the target is evident. Its the white SJWs the enemy. Its them who wish to impose their will on society. Look around you: who is inserting black niggers and viados in every single game? The SJWs do it. Who is rewriting our history and who deleted history of the west to replace it with history of civic rights movements? SJWs at it again. Who is the people who promote DEI and put a black woman in a managerial role even if she doesnt deserve it? Its the SJW, correct right answer again. Who is changing our school curricula adding all these pro-arab pro-brown, pro-feminist narrations? Oh my god the SJWs at it again yet another time.

So who fits the Marcuse definition more appropriately: the SJWs, yeah these people do.

The marxist teachers, the journalist conglomerates, the NGOs, the jewish orgs that promote the definition of "antisemitism". They are all suited for the marcuse definition wouldnt you agree?

But for some magic of this deceptive communist language, who ends up being called "bourgeoisie"? Its us. We poor people, we whites, we low status people get labeled "racist" or maybe "antisemite" or "conspiracy theorist". Whatever. But we dont suit the definition of marcuse. For instance Marcuse says one important condition is "have money" and we dont have it. We have no method to "impose our will on society" not currently at least.

This is one of the many problems of communism, but trust me theres more, much more. Its just this problem in particular is the one that pisses me off worse than other things.