I wrote a shitpost about negotiating roles and Jpeterson. I already noticed you dont negotiate in a multiculty society. But lets discuss power difference when I attempt negotiate an incel role with hollywood or just simple journalists.
I too was contacted by journalists in the past, especially after Elliot Rodger statusmaxed the entire incel community. So since I was at the time the most edgy and visible incel in our local community, got these journalists. Little did they know I am not a clown, and is true I do post all these dicks and hentai porns on the internet but I was able to hold my own vs journalists.
I tried to tell them we reject hollywood. We refuse to be described by joker taxi driver and we refuse roles. Which is why we are incel. But no, journalists I noticed came with a closed mind. They watched hollywood movies, they understood an incel is someone who hates women. I didnt hate women not even once. I told journalists to verify their claims and show me at the very least 1 post of mine where I would have expressed "hate" against a woman.
Well at the time journalists had a theory on their side, feminism produced scientific researches on "hate" and it was when "hate speech" was the word in usage. To make it short, they would "demonstrate" "scientifically" that you hate women even if you do not express it with words. They say for instance sharing a meme is hate, or wording your phrases in a certain way is hate or when you have a slightly negative remark vs a woman you met is "hate of all women". Feminists of the time, also successfully changed the law to include the term "femicide", a category of homicide that was supposed to be motivated by ideological hatred of "all women".
The issue I had with that definition is how the heck you demonstrate it in a tribunal? Do you plug electrodes into someone skull and probe his mind to find traces of an ideological hatred for all women? Or what? Well realistically it happens this: the feminist CLAIMS you hate all women, but she has no proof. In other words is arbitrary, they can claim you hate women, and you have no method to defend. No lawyer was prepared to defend you because when a new problem arises in law there are usually very few lawyers who specialize in that specific problem.
It was like this for issues related to internet security. Since is a technical field, few lawyers have knowledge enough to defend you. And the few ones who did have this knowledge asked to be payed alot. Same as when feminist accuse you of something without any basis, there were close to zero lawyers prepared to defend you against the feminist aggression. Because it was all new editing of the law and you cannot expect law schools to prepare students so quickly to respond to the threat. So the result is for a time feminists achieved ruthless domination and arbitrary judgement of a ton of men.
So my question remains open. How the fuck do I negotiate my personality when I am up against hollywood or feminism? I always got crushed.
How do you negotiate with hollywood?
-
Sustacel250
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
