My speculation about failure of marriage

[Sustacel250]

Gale-Shapley algorithm is failing. I have some speculation about it.

I heard many of my pals saying they learned society and history from games like civilization or rome total war. Yeah I think games can teach you how to be in society, why not. But one thing I would like to point out is that games are programs and they follow rules. If you really want to compare society to a game, I would imagine a game that allows you to change the rules if you win.

Instead, computer games have fixed rules that dont chage. Which brings me to this idea: I think elites gamed out society. Elites won so much in society that they gamed it out entirely. Every iteration of the game, the elite runs super advantaged, they start exploiting asymmetries instantly. And then they game out the system more and more, exploit more asymmetries and move forward.

Instead normies at some point are born in a gamed out system. And they cant win, theres no victory condition anymore in the social game. Which is why marriages fail mostly in the low status strata of the society. Marriages fail a little bit less in the managerial social class (feminists for example get 64% marriage rate, higher than avg normies). And upper tier elites instead use marriage to accrue more wealth, forge bonds and keep expanding their influence outside of the family unit and preserve their genetic and financial capitals indefinitely.

So marriage is maximally useful for elites and is simply broken for low status plebs. Its a bit of a mixed situation in managerial class. I think social malfunction is more visible in the lower class of society. Elites will always be removed from issues, because they are the game masters. This was my perspective. I always refused to listen to redpillers on this topic, they usually want to "go back to the past" so they always gave me shit analysis.

[Sustacel250]

The problem of gale-shapley is that "stable matches" exist only if you assume things like fixed preferences, fixed rules, fixed classes. Once rule-editing occurs, stability is no longer here. The algorithm is fucked because the players can now rewrite the preference structures themselves. I mean, some players can, elites can. Managerial class for example cant.

Most people follow the algorithm of gale-shapley, because they are unaware sheeple. Its a system created to make them fail because is class-bound. Theres no moral decay here, no feminism to blame, no jews to blame, no mason to blame. Its simply a gamed out system in my view. Depending on path following is the demise of normies. They have been captured in a game that cannot be won. So I also think normies no longer exist.

Rule-editing is what matters, and normies are doomed. Its completely over for them. it isnt over for me for example.