Misogyny types.

Talk about anything pertaining to men's rights and the plight of disenfranchised men
Post Reply
Sustacel250
Reactions:
Posts: 377
Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

Since I have read a ton of feminism sociology I came to believe they are abusing the rule of law and academia system and they are ruining science. So I decided I want to do their job because they clearly cant. I have very little patience with people who are incompetent, I didnt have any issues doing the journalist job the lawyer job or other jobs. If I have to, I will also be a philosopher or a politician.

So I redefined misogyny because feminists cant produce accurate definitions. I also invented some types. You may think "why should I accept your invented types, youre not an accredited feminist scholar". Youre correct, you dont have to accept them. I just present them to you. Then you decide if you want to believe to "accredited feminsit scholars" or to me or you want to invent your own words like I do. We live in times where official sources are useless and dont do their job. Its up to you if you want to believe to them. I schizomaxed in my life, in many areas I am my own source.

Type1: Blunt unprocessed misogyny. Low status defense mechanism of adaptation. In a nutshell, reactive responses vs women.
Type 2: Institutional misogyny. It is unconscious, historically normalized. In a nutshell a group level misogyny that is result of elites who gamed out a system in the past and they introduced mating biases to favor their family preservation of capitals (including genetic).
Type 3: Aesthetic intellectualized misogyny. Made with the purpose of attracting a mate. For example: incels who get into joker, taxi driver, that stuff. It allows you to be a social type that women want to mate with.
Type 4: Strategic adaptation. Its all about resource and sexual exploitation via behavioral programming. Redpill is a big example of this type of misogyny.
Type 5: Metaphysical misogyny. Is ontological gender negation. A level of misogyny that is all about self-stablizing an individual. It is done by rare people, or people who project entropy into the feminine for personal reasons.

In any case, this is how I understand the misogyny. As I said, I know feminist so called "experts" or "authorities" have different opinions. I have considered their opinions, I found them utter trash and they dont help me understand the world. Since I take my life seriously and I want to have accurate maps of the world I invented new concepts. And my concepts work, and they describe the world. So Im fine using them.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in