"Queer resistance" event to be held in SLC, Sep. 27

[IBG]

Give this article a read and you'll probably laugh, roll your eyes, or both:

https://yaf.org/news/university-of-utah ... t-militia/

Basically, this "oppressed" group of trans, gay, etc is holding a rally in Salt Lake City on Sep. 27. They openly display assault rifles and make demands for society to be erased or restructured to fit their demands. I'm very sure the FBI will focus on this event, and not worry about those currently for former "incel". The vast majority of mass shooters, serial killers, terrorists etc have had sexual partners. (Timothy McVeigh was rumored to be a virgin, but he looked far too high-tier IMO). To be serious, it would be a pitifully wasted opportunity if the local FBI don't have a few glowers sitting in on this meeting.

This will inevitably remind you of Charlie Kirk who, even if you disagreed with him, was still assassinated by a troon-loving dipshit. Not one member of the IPF, from what it seems, has ever threatened, let alone carried out, such an act.

I'd like to ask what our consensus is on such a thing. Personally, I feel nothing but disgust and revulsion at these people. I might even need to start watching Bluesky (where these dipshits are) and snitch on them to the Feds.

[Darth_aurelius]

Give this article a read and you'll probably laugh, roll your eyes, or both:

https://yaf.org/news/university-of-utah ... t-militia/

Basically, this "oppressed" group of trans, gay, etc is holding a rally in Salt Lake City on Sep. 27. They openly display assault rifles and make demands for society to be erased or restructured to fit their demands. I'm very sure the FBI will focus on this event, and not worry about those currently for former "incel". The vast majority of mass shooters, serial killers, terrorists etc have had sexual partners. (Timothy McVeigh was rumored to be a virgin, but he looked far too high-tier IMO). To be serious, it would be a pitifully wasted opportunity if the local FBI don't have a few glowers sitting in on this meeting.

This will inevitably remind you of Charlie Kirk who, even if you disagreed with him, was still assassinated by a troon-loving dipshit. Not one member of the IPF, from what it seems, has ever threatened, let alone carried out, such an act.

I'd like to ask what our consensus is on such a thing. Personally, I feel nothing but disgust and revulsion at these people. I might even need to start watching Bluesky (where these dipshits are) and snitch on them to the Feds.

I may have misapprehended your meaning but I believe you're posing a rhetorical question concerning what you perceive to be a misallocation of investigative resources by federal law enforcement agencies on the basis of their incoherent threat matrix algorithms.

As someone who have been targeted by law enforcement on several occasions by clumsily executed surveillance operations and one attempt by a state police detective to actually infiltrate the IPF by trying to induce me to recruit him irl, I can say that law enforcement at all levels (local, county, state, federal and even international) seems to be disproportionately concerned with the potential for incel inspired violence.

Our own modus operandi and organizational ethos is one which pledges fidelity and obedience to the applicable laws and which very explicitly disavows any illicit activities, be they violent or merely those which transgress upon statutory prohibitions.

My personal conjecture on this strange paradox is that because organizations such as the IPF employ rhetoric which can be construed as embracing the full continuum of hate speech (anti-Semitic, misogynistic, racist, etc.) that we exacerbate and heighten the interests of law enforcement, though if any degree of meaningful scrutiny were actually applied in even the most perfunctory manner, anyone with an iq above that of room temperature would quickly deduce that these different ideological strands are as impossible to parse as they are to reconcile.

[VH911]

Troons and so on are absolutely disgusting narcissistic vile peaces of shit. They are NOT the victims.
All this lgbt stuff only exists to attack male sexuality. trans identifying men try to get attention from women, and they are misandrists, because they team up with feminists to blame men for everything just to get short female validation. and most of them are trans identifying women who mutilate their body with your tax money to harm men, it's an attack on male sexuality.
TTD

Also lesbians don't exist. If you look at the stats it would be up to 60% of young women.
TLD

[General Alek]

They actually have balls to do that in Utah

[IBG]

Give this article a read and you'll probably laugh, roll your eyes, or both:

https://yaf.org/news/university-of-utah ... t-militia/

Basically, this "oppressed" group of trans, gay, etc is holding a rally in Salt Lake City on Sep. 27. They openly display assault rifles and make demands for society to be erased or restructured to fit their demands. I'm very sure the FBI will focus on this event, and not worry about those currently for former "incel". The vast majority of mass shooters, serial killers, terrorists etc have had sexual partners. (Timothy McVeigh was rumored to be a virgin, but he looked far too high-tier IMO). To be serious, it would be a pitifully wasted opportunity if the local FBI don't have a few glowers sitting in on this meeting.

This will inevitably remind you of Charlie Kirk who, even if you disagreed with him, was still assassinated by a troon-loving dipshit. Not one member of the IPF, from what it seems, has ever threatened, let alone carried out, such an act.

I'd like to ask what our consensus is on such a thing. Personally, I feel nothing but disgust and revulsion at these people. I might even need to start watching Bluesky (where these dipshits are) and snitch on them to the Feds.

I may have misapprehended your meaning but I believe you're posing a rhetorical question concerning what you perceive to be a misallocation of investigative resources by federal law enforcement agencies on the basis of their incoherent threat matrix algorithms.

As someone who have been targeted by law enforcement on several occasions by clumsily executed surveillance operations and one attempt by a state police detective to actually infiltrate the IPF by trying to induce me to recruit him irl, I can say that law enforcement at all levels (local, county, state, federal and even international) seems to be disproportionately concerned with the potential for incel inspired violence.

Our own modus operandi and organizational ethos is one which pledges fidelity and obedience to the applicable laws and which very explicitly disavows any illicit activities, be they violent or merely those which transgress upon statutory prohibitions.

My personal conjecture on this strange paradox is that because organizations such as the IPF employ rhetoric which can be construed as embracing the full continuum of hate speech (anti-Semitic, misogynistic, racist, etc.) that we exacerbate and heighten the interests of law enforcement, though if any degree of meaningful scrutiny were actually applied in even the most perfunctory manner, anyone with an iq above that of room temperature would quickly deduce that these different ideological strands are as impossible to parse as they are to reconcile.

I'm also thinking if the SLC campus wouldn't mind hosting *our* meeting there. Surely they wouldn't be a bunch of paranoid hypocrites?

Yeah, we probably would know the answer to that.

[Darth_aurelius]

Give this article a read and you'll probably laugh, roll your eyes, or both:

https://yaf.org/news/university-of-utah ... t-militia/

Basically, this "oppressed" group of trans, gay, etc is holding a rally in Salt Lake City on Sep. 27. They openly display assault rifles and make demands for society to be erased or restructured to fit their demands. I'm very sure the FBI will focus on this event, and not worry about those currently for former "incel". The vast majority of mass shooters, serial killers, terrorists etc have had sexual partners. (Timothy McVeigh was rumored to be a virgin, but he looked far too high-tier IMO). To be serious, it would be a pitifully wasted opportunity if the local FBI don't have a few glowers sitting in on this meeting.

This will inevitably remind you of Charlie Kirk who, even if you disagreed with him, was still assassinated by a troon-loving dipshit. Not one member of the IPF, from what it seems, has ever threatened, let alone carried out, such an act.

I'd like to ask what our consensus is on such a thing. Personally, I feel nothing but disgust and revulsion at these people. I might even need to start watching Bluesky (where these dipshits are) and snitch on them to the Feds.

I may have misapprehended your meaning but I believe you're posing a rhetorical question concerning what you perceive to be a misallocation of investigative resources by federal law enforcement agencies on the basis of their incoherent threat matrix algorithms.

As someone who have been targeted by law enforcement on several occasions by clumsily executed surveillance operations and one attempt by a state police detective to actually infiltrate the IPF by trying to induce me to recruit him irl, I can say that law enforcement at all levels (local, county, state, federal and even international) seems to be disproportionately concerned with the potential for incel inspired violence.

Our own modus operandi and organizational ethos is one which pledges fidelity and obedience to the applicable laws and which very explicitly disavows any illicit activities, be they violent or merely those which transgress upon statutory prohibitions.

My personal conjecture on this strange paradox is that because organizations such as the IPF employ rhetoric which can be construed as embracing the full continuum of hate speech (anti-Semitic, misogynistic, racist, etc.) that we exacerbate and heighten the interests of law enforcement, though if any degree of meaningful scrutiny were actually applied in even the most perfunctory manner, anyone with an iq above that of room temperature would quickly deduce that these different ideological strands are as impossible to parse as they are to reconcile.

I'm also thinking if the SLC campus wouldn't mind hosting *our* meeting there. Surely they wouldn't be a bunch of paranoid hypocrites?

Yeah, we probably would know the answer to that.

When we eventually reach a point in our developmental trajectory as a political movement which allows for us to actually organize a real world incel power demonstration, I plan on holding it in the Midwestern US due to the large number of comrades who live within a reasonable driving distance of this geographic area as well as on account of my own proximity.

I would arrange for a permit to be issued to the IBM by the appropriate administrative entity which would allow us to publicly demonstrate on the grounds of a state capitol building thereby both ensuring maximum public and media exposure as well as providing an exquisitely immaculate backdrop for the high ranking SS officers such as myself who would be delivering Fuhrer-like speeches to the masses.

[IBG]

I may have misapprehended your meaning but I believe you're posing a rhetorical question concerning what you perceive to be a misallocation of investigative resources by federal law enforcement agencies on the basis of their incoherent threat matrix algorithms.

As someone who have been targeted by law enforcement on several occasions by clumsily executed surveillance operations and one attempt by a state police detective to actually infiltrate the IPF by trying to induce me to recruit him irl, I can say that law enforcement at all levels (local, county, state, federal and even international) seems to be disproportionately concerned with the potential for incel inspired violence.

Our own modus operandi and organizational ethos is one which pledges fidelity and obedience to the applicable laws and which very explicitly disavows any illicit activities, be they violent or merely those which transgress upon statutory prohibitions.

My personal conjecture on this strange paradox is that because organizations such as the IPF employ rhetoric which can be construed as embracing the full continuum of hate speech (anti-Semitic, misogynistic, racist, etc.) that we exacerbate and heighten the interests of law enforcement, though if any degree of meaningful scrutiny were actually applied in even the most perfunctory manner, anyone with an iq above that of room temperature would quickly deduce that these different ideological strands are as impossible to parse as they are to reconcile.

I'm also thinking if the SLC campus wouldn't mind hosting *our* meeting there. Surely they wouldn't be a bunch of paranoid hypocrites?

Yeah, we probably would know the answer to that.

When we eventually reach a point in our developmental trajectory as a political movement which allows for us to actually organize a real world incel power demonstration, I plan on holding it in the Midwestern US due to the large number of comrades who live within a reasonable driving distance of this geographic area as well as on account of my own proximity.

I would arrange for a permit to be issued to the IBM by the appropriate administrative entity which would allow us to publicly demonstrate on the grounds of a state capitol building thereby both ensuring maximum public and media exposure as well as providing an exquisitely immaculate backdrop for the high ranking SS officers such as myself who would be delivering Fuhrer-like speeches to the masses.

Hmm, that's a good thought to have. Maybe if the IPF came out as anti trans-terror, and in support of conservative values the likes of which Kirk had.

I definitely feel disgusted at all those celebrating Kirk's death, and I'm sure many "incels" would also.

[IBG]

@y2k @Orzmund

[Darth_aurelius]

I'm also thinking if the SLC campus wouldn't mind hosting *our* meeting there. Surely they wouldn't be a bunch of paranoid hypocrites?

Yeah, we probably would know the answer to that.

When we eventually reach a point in our developmental trajectory as a political movement which allows for us to actually organize a real world incel power demonstration, I plan on holding it in the Midwestern US due to the large number of comrades who live within a reasonable driving distance of this geographic area as well as on account of my own proximity.

I would arrange for a permit to be issued to the IBM by the appropriate administrative entity which would allow us to publicly demonstrate on the grounds of a state capitol building thereby both ensuring maximum public and media exposure as well as providing an exquisitely immaculate backdrop for the high ranking SS officers such as myself who would be delivering Fuhrer-like speeches to the masses.

Hmm, that's a good thought to have. Maybe if the IPF came out as anti trans-terror, and in support of conservative values the likes of which Kirk had.

I definitely feel disgusted at all those celebrating Kirk's death, and I'm sure many "incels" would also.

As I told comrades in our recent staff meeting on element, I am really indifferent as to the suffering or indeed, the death of someone like Kirk. While he may have rightfully excoriated the troon loving community and imputed to them the degeneracy which they are rightfully owed, he supported the jews, equivocated on the depredations of israel and, as far as I can tell, was very likely a sex haver.

As for the IPF's political objectives and ideological platform, we need to remain focused on vindicating and consummating the rights of disenfranchised young men who lack female companionship. While we may align with entities that appeal to the sensibilities of a more normative constituency, such alliances will merely be for the sake of expediency and not out of principle.