He broke the no-simp-rule

[VH911]

viewtopic.php?f=9&p=16172#p16172

[Vincent]

viewtopic.php?f=9&p=16172#p16172

Hey, I have never simped as hard as General Alek. Look, if I have the choice to pay an e-whore or to stick my dick into an animal I pick the e-whore 10/10 times, what about you?

Der Führer would agree.

[Sustacel250]

I simped ewhores as well. 2 in particular. If you know me, I dont like to get scammed I dont get scammed at all. I am also in a simp community for simping. Overall, to me, the idea of simping isnt bad. And let me compare it to something else. For instance, what about paying an eceleb or an influencer or a political commentator. I find that very shameful considering that we live on the internet and you can intellectualmax for free on sacredtexts.org or libgen.

What really is important in life is porn sex and prostitution. And there never is a thing such as "enough porn", there will never be a moment in humanity where we say "ok we done enough porn we are ok now". Nah, porn is always important. On the other hand intellectualism truly isnt important, and can be surrogated. No intellectual matters more than the study you could do yourself on the internet.

This isnt to say simping is less bad compared to something else. Its to explain why simping online allows you probably to do less of it in real life. At least judging with the results I got in life really seems to be the case.