How the Bear vs. Man Debate Reveals the Depths of Misandry

In recent weeks a new trend has emerged and gone viral on TikTok. Women are being asked the hypothetical question, if they were walking alone in the forest, would they rather encounter an unknown man or a bear? In one of the most viral such examples, seven of the eight women interviewed chose the bear. The trend has grown into all manner of women on TikTok rationalizing their misandry and hatred of men. Perhaps one could argue the referenced video is staged, but what of all the other similar answers from women you shall surely find from a quick search?

To any sane spectator, this result seems bewildering. How could a man possibly pose as great a threat to a lone woman as a wild animal, let alone a bear? Here I will presume a grizzly bear or an American black bear, as these are the species an American audience has the most likelihood of encountering. You need only look at a few videos of bear encounters to understand the contrast in strength and size compared to the average human male. There is simply no debate in matter of physical power. If it desired, a bear could takedown, maul, and slaughter the average human and particularly the average woman.

Some of the women emotionally reason further that despite the physical difference, men are more aggressive than bears and inflict worse forms of pain. Human men are brutes and rapists and abusers, and these women use their anecdotal traumatic experiences with men as their reason for their decision in this thought experiment. But these are not sincere considerations of the question, these women are simply using the question as an opportunity to air their emotional grievances of the men they dealt with in their past. But in their answer, they generalize all men into being rapists, pedophiles, etc. while simps and feminists validate their misandry. They use their supposed trauma to garner social sympathy to cover for their bigotry.

This would not be acceptable towards any other group. Input men with Jews, Muslims, Blacks, etc. “You ne very know a Jew’s intentions, even if they seem nice! They’re unpredictable. “At least a bear won’t bomb me or hijack an airplane, some Muslims do!” “A bear can’t steal my wallet and rob me like a nigger would.” Normies would respond to any of these scenarios saying you’re a bigot and overgeneralizing. But when the target is men—feminists, trannies, and simps encourage hatred and ridicule. It is socially acceptable to demonize and ridicule men, yet even questioning a woman’s emotionally charged, overgeneralizing claims is considered outrageous.

The reality is, for all these TikTok whores cry and screech with their crocodile tears, political institutions and the broader social order values and caters to females more than men. Men’s lives are valued less and treated with less care and sympathy. For evidence, the archive of realsexism.org compiles many such examples of gynocentric practices in our society. It is men who suffer the most from violent crime, homelessness, and lack of social and medical support. Alas, the women that need to accept and assimilate these facts are too blinded by their emotional hysterics and lack of self-awareness. They hate you and want you to die because some jock from however long ago raped them or did something distasteful. Your countrywomen prefer the company of a carnivorous untamed flesh tank over you, not for your own faults, but because you are a man. It is time men stand together to call out and expose misandry.